NEWS
By Donald F. Norris and Paul S. Herrnson | February 26, 2007
Momentum is developing within the Maryland General Assembly to get rid of the state's perfectly functional touch screen voting system and replace it with an optical scan voting system that uses paper ballots. This proposed change is not only unnecessary, it would have negative consequences that no one, including proponents of paper ballot/optical scan voting systems, will like. It is fair to say that the touch screen system has performed well. Votes on touch screen machines were recorded and reported accurately in the 2004 and 2006 primary and general elections.
NEWS
By Andrea F. Siegel and Andrea F. Siegel,SUN STAFF | July 23, 2004
Lawyers for the state Board of Elections and the National Federation of the Blind of Maryland asked a judge yesterday to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks to decertify Maryland's 16,000 electronic voting machines until upgrades are made to the new voting system. The Takoma-Park based Campaign for Verifiable Voting and other plaintiffs sued in April. They contend that the touch-screen system does not comply with state law because it is vulnerable to security weaknesses and needs a paper trail for recounts, backup and audits.
NEWS
BY A SUN STAFF WRITER | November 22, 2003
Two prominent state senators have asked to expand a review of Maryland's new electronic voting system. Among other things, they want an analysis of the system's failure to provide printable paper receipts, a feature critics of the touch-screen machines have long requested. Sen. Paula C. Hollinger, chairman of the Education, Health and Environmental Affairs Committee, and Sen. Norman R. Stone Jr., head of a subcommittee on elections, asked the state Department of Legislative Services yesterday to widen its look at machines made by Diebold Election Systems.
NEWS
By BONITA FORMWALT | November 4, 1992
It's frozen yogurt vs. ice cream; a Yugo compared with the '65 Mustang; a turquoise Princess telephone with lighted dial instead of a six-ounce piece of plastic that chirps.It's the Optech II voting system: a long, skinny ballot card and pen that is replacing voting machines.Yes, I'm aware that the new voting system is faster and more accurate, but I can't help but feel that the majesty of the voting process, with its curtained booth, has been lost in our quest to tally votes faster.The actual voting process now resembles an S.A.T.
NEWS
By Larry Carson and Larry Carson,SUN STAFF | January 12, 2001
Howard County's 12-year- old voting system is "unstable" and could fail during the next election, a county election official told the County Council yesterday. But Maryland elections administrator Linda H. Lamone said that trying to buy a new system now might be ill-advised. While a gubernatorial committee and the General Assembly decide on a standardized statewide voting system and funding, Howard County might consider leasing new equipment for the 2002 elections, Lamone said. Robert G. Antonetti, Howard's elections administrator, said he is worried about the county's Op-Tech II paper ballot voting system, because parts for the electronic counting machines are not available and the county had to hire software technicians from Alabama for the presidential election.
NEWS
By Larry Carson and Larry Carson,SUN STAFF | May 7, 1999
Secure in her primary election victory for Howard County register of wills, a tired, but happy Kay K. Hartleb relaxed at home last September -- until she flipped on her television.An errant county voting machine computer chip gave Larry G. Fales, her Republican rival, an extra 40,000 votes -- more votes, she knew, than were cast for both candidates combined."It was a real shocker," Hartleb remembers, chuckling. "I had won easily. I had seen it at [election] headquarters."The computer error was quickly corrected, but county elections administrator Barbara W. Feaga said the incident helped convince her it is time to start shopping for a new voting system.