NEWS
By Los Angeles Times | November 27, 1991
MOSCOW -- Russian Federation President Boris N. Yeltsin, angered by what he sees as an attempt by the Soviet government to preserve its powers over the independence-minded republics, will oppose the draft treaty that establishes the constitutional basis for a new state, his deputy prime minister said yesterday.Instead, Mr. Yeltsin will propose his own plan, concentrating power in the republic governments -- and, effectively, putting his Russian Federation, as the largest and richest republic, in control of the country.
NEWS
By Kathy Lally and Kathy Lally,Moscow Bureau of The Sun | August 31, 1991
MOSCOW -- A glimpse of what a future Soviet Union might look like began to emerge yesterday as Russia and Kazakhstan agreed to seek a new, looser union run by 15 equal republics instead of a central government.While Russia, the largest republic, and Kazakhstan, the third-largest, were negotiating, the liberal new head of the KGB declared that agreement on a new union treaty was not only still possible but also vital to create a stability that would lead to economic reforms. Without such reforms, he said, the nation faces economic catastrophe.
NEWS
By Kathy Lally and Kathy Lally,Moscow Bureau of The Sun | August 27, 1991
MOSCOW -- The largely discredited leadership of the Soviet Union struggled unsuccessfully to recapture a semblance of authority yesterday as the republics acted decisively to free themselves from the old ties.Other nations began establishing diplomatic ties with the Baltics, where Lithuania started to issue its own visas for the first time in half a century. The Uzbekistan Parliament prepared to declare independence, as the Ukraine and Byelorussia already have.Moldova plans to vote on independence today, and the chairman of Armenia's Parliament, Levon Ter-Petrosyan, pronounced that "the center is dead.
NEWS
August 26, 1991
What kind of new Soviet Union will emerge from the travail of seven days that shook the world? No one knows the answer to that question, but we could envision the following scenario:The first order of business is the signing of the new union treaty, which was the precipitating factor in the last desperate attempt of the old central bureaucracy to hold onto privilege and power. In fact, the treaty should be amended to bestow even greater power on the republics which have entered the treaty, placing them roughly in the same position as the American states.
NEWS
By SCOTT SHANE and SCOTT SHANE,Scott Shane was The Sun's Moscow correspondent from April, 1988 until last month | August 25, 1991
Many Americans naturally assumed that last week's fleeting Soviet coup d'etat was aimed at stopping democracy. But the truth is not so simple.If democracy was what worried the hard-liners, why did the tanks not roll in the spring of 1989, to halt the first free parliamentary elections? Why did they not move in the spring of 1990, when the Communist Party was forced to relinquish its seven-decade-old monopoly on power? The hard-liners were stronger then, the people more wary, and the chances for a coup to succeed far greater than they were shown to be last week.
NEWS
August 25, 1991
As Western nations squabble publicly about speeding up financial aid for the post-coup Soviet Union, the signing of a new union treaty that will determine relations between the central government in Moscow and the 15 restive republics has been quietly postponed.This may seem a curiosity in that the scheduled signing of the treaty last Tuesday reputedly was the trigger that prompted the plotters to act. What may be happening is that Russian President Boris N. Yeltsin, who has replaced Soviet President Mikhail S. Gorbachev as the nation's most powerful politician, is going through what his own top banker has described as a needed learning process.