NEWS
By Stephanie Desmon | September 23, 2009
The Food and Drug Administration banned Tuesday the sale of fruit- and candy-flavored cigarettes in the U.S., hoping to rid the market of products that the agency says make smoking more attractive to children. While flavored cigarettes make up a tiny fraction of tobacco products sold, the move marks the first major step made by the FDA since it was given the power this year to regulate tobacco products. The next step? The agency will look into whether other flavored tobacco products - including popular menthols - will also be barred from U.S. store shelves.
NEWS
By Laura Barnhardt | July 5, 2008
To lift a burden from the police, Baltimore County lawmakers authorized the Health Department last year to take over the task of imposing fines on store clerks who sell cigarettes to underage teenagers. But the county hasn't been doing that job - intentionally - because officials say they are opposed to using minors in sting operations. The county's approach is drawing criticism from some legal and health advocates who say it is not an effective deterrent. "You can shake your finger, but if there's no repercussions, what will make a person think twice about it?"
NEWS
May 19, 2008
Congress wants to give the Food and Drug Administration power to regulate cigarettes and even ban most flavored cigarettes. But there's a catch. Menthol cigarettes would be exempted from the ban, leaving in place a large portion of the cigarette market that has particular appeal to young people and to African-Americans. That appears to be the distasteful price for putting cigarettes under the watchful eye of the FDA. But if Congress indeed gives the FDA the oversight authority, the agency should look seriously at the scientific evidence and make its own determination about whether menthol cigarettes deserve a regulatory pass.
NEWS
By Jonathan D. Rockoff | April 3, 2008
WASHINGTON -- Landmark legislation that would give the federal government the power to regulate cigarettes and other tobacco products passed an early hurdle yesterday. The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved the bill, 38-12. The measure would allow the Food and Drug Administration to review new tobacco products before they could go on sale, limit advertising and restrict sales to youths. It would also enable the agency to regulate levels of tar, nicotine and other ingredients.
NEWS
By Tyeesha Dixon | December 30, 2007
Smokers in Maryland will have to pay an extra buck to light up Tuesday when a $2 cigarette tax goes into effect statewide. The $1-a-pack increase - passed into law last month during a special session of the Maryland General Assembly - means Maryland has, with five other states, the fourth-highest cigarette tax in the nation, according to data from the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Maine and Michigan also have $2-a-pack levies. Baltimore smokers interviewed yesterday had mixed emotions about the increase.
NEWS
By Los Angeles Times | February 28, 2007
WASHINGTON -- The Food and Drug Administration should be able to limit nicotine levels in cigarettes, as well as require stronger health warnings on packages and in advertising, legislators considering a bill to allow the agency to regulate tobacco products were told by experts yesterday. "FDA regulation will help us to combat the vicious marketing practices of a deceptive industry that has preyed upon our children, minorities and existing smokers who are desperately trying to kick their habit," Dr. Elmer Huerta, the incoming president of the American Cancer Society, told the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee.
NEWS
By Jamie Smith Hopkins | August 14, 2004
One sign that Maryland's stop-smoking campaign is paying off is what isn't - the state collected $6.7 million less in tobacco taxes last fiscal year as sales continued to dip. Revenue decreased almost 2.5 percent, which is typical in recent years and slightly less than the state had expected, the comptroller's office said yesterday. While cigarette purchases edged downward, revenue from lesser-used tobacco products such as snuff increased 12 percent, or $800,000. All told, the state took in $272.
NEWS
By Valerie Reitman | June 21, 2004
A growing number of anti-smoking researchers and public health advocates are adopting a tactic that not long ago would have been considered heresy: saying that hard-core smokers who can't kick the habit would be better off switching to new smokeless tobacco products. With slogans such as "Spit-free" and "For when you can't smoke," these products differ markedly from the messy snuff and chewing tobacco stereotypes associated with your granddad's spittoon or pro baseball players' stuffed cheeks.
NEWS
By Ellen Goodman | May 5, 2003
BOSTON -- The way I figure it, this is a time when our government might inhale deeply and pause for a bit of multilateral fence-mending. I don't expect Donald Rumsfeld to sing "Kumbaya" in a Parisian cafe with Jacques Chirac. But couldn't we make common cause with the rest of the world in pursuit of an international killer, a globally certified bad guy? Like, say, the Marlboro Man? The World Health Organization has spent three years hammering out an agreement with 171 countries to prevent the spread of smoking-related diseases, especially in the developing world.
NEWS
By Larry Carson | June 28, 2001
Anti-smoking advocates visited 50 Howard County stores that sell tobacco products last week and found all but nine were complying with a new law requiring the products be displayed out of customers' reach. Members of Smoke Free Howard County, who pushed for passage of the law in February, sent volunteers to visit about one-fifth of the county's stores and gas stations that sell tobacco, and said they are pleased with the result despite the "violations." "Clearly, the law is working," said Glenn Schneider, legislative chair of the coalition.