BUSINESS
By Kenneth R. Harney and Kenneth R. Harney,Washington Post Writers Group | August 24, 1997
The ink is barely dry on the 1997 tax law, but creative accountants and tax lawyers already have spotted ways for homeowners -- and other real estate owners -- to reap benefits beyond what even Congress might have contemplated.Tops on the list: Call it the serial home-sale strategy.It could save some property owners hundreds of thousands of dollars over a period of years.The technique has potential applicability to homeowners who also own a second house or condo, a vacation house or any rental residential property.
NEWS
By Laura Cadiz and Laura Cadiz,SUN STAFF | June 5, 2003
The Howard County Taxpayers Association's petition drive to reverse the county's income tax increase has hit a minor snag. After about 50 volunteers started gathering signatures this week on a petition to put the issue of raising the income tax to 3.20 percent to a countywide referendum, the group's president yesterday realized the petition's format was flawed. The phrasing on the petition of the tax law did not meet state and county guidelines, said Pat Dornan, the group's president.
NEWS
By Neal A. Peirce | August 10, 1997
NEITHER THE PRESS nor real estate moguls seem to have noticed. But inner cities could reap a harvest of residential investment from a provision of the new budget-tax law that virtually repeals the capital gains tax on the sale of personal homes.That's surely not what President Clinton and the Republican Congress focused on when they decided to allow individuals up to $250,000, couples up to $500,000, in tax-free gains on selling their residences. The politicos were making another play to America's perennially pampered homeowners.
BUSINESS
By EILEEN AMBROSE | June 24, 2001
MAXXED out on your retirement plan at work and wish you could salt away more? Got a late start on saving for retirement and want to catch up? If so, the new tax law has something for you. Among the highlights: A boost in contribution limits for individual retirement accounts and 401(k)s; a chance for workers 50 and older to contribute more than the new caps; a tax credit for lower-income workers saving for retirement; and a new plan with a tax-free feature. Of course, some changes will be available only if employers adopt them.
BUSINESS
By Karen Lazarovic and Karen Lazarovic,Columbia Features Inc | March 6, 1991
Q.I have been living with my boyfriend for two years and we are contemplating marriage. We both earn good salaries: $90,000 and $80,000 as attorneys. I have often heard of the "marriage penalty" when it comes to paying taxes. Can you explain how it would apply if we were married in 1991.A. The "marriage penalty" refers to the extra tax a couple would pay if they married and filed their tax returns jointly versus remaining single and filing as individuals.The new tax law that went into effect last fall increases that marriage penalty.
BUSINESS
By Jane Bryant Quinn and Jane Bryant Quinn,Washington Post Writers Group | August 10, 1998
IT TAKES 808 pages for CCH Inc., a tax information service, to explain the new tax law. Most of the provisions are narrow. But when they affect you, they can make a big difference. For example:reverse the transaction without penalty, as long you do so by the due date of your tax return (including extensions). To reverse it, call your Roth trustee and say you want to make the change. You'll be taxed on any money you withdraw in cash.Why would you want to switch back to a regular IRA? Two possible reasons:First, you might discover that your income exceeded $100,000, which makes you ineligible for a Roth.