NEWS
By Arnold Rosenfeld | November 5, 1998
COUNT on it, there will be many on the far right who will attribute the Republican decline in Tuesday's national election to lack of zeal and belief in the old-time religion. But that will be a hard point to make.The election, as it turned out, was not a referendum on President Clinton or Monica Lewinsky. It was a referendum on that blandest of human attributes, moderation. The public would like more of it, less of name-calling, fewer hare-brained ideas like shutting down the government for the fun of it.The root of the Republican decline since the party's immense victory in 1994 has been a terrible misreading of the public mind.
NEWS
By Ben Wattenberg | November 7, 1996
WASHINGTON -- The people have spoken. But what have they said? If you think the spin season is over, think again. The mandate-mongering moment is upon us. Here is the mandate I monger:Yes, it was a ''status-quo'' election. Bill Clinton was (and is) president. Republicans held (and hold) the Congress. The Republicans held (and hold) the governorships. State legislative chambers remain competitive.President Clinton ran a professional and astute campaign. By co-opting the values issues early and often, he ate Bob Dole's lunch.
NEWS
By Russell Baker | February 2, 1995
SOMEBODY on the Brinkley show Sunday asked Gov. Christine Whitman of New Jersey about the Republican "revolution" and she looked uneasy with the word, but then went ahead and accepted it, hedging that, well, it was "in some sense" a "revolution."It was one of the few reassuring public moments we've had from a Republican since the media and Washington succumbed to Noot madness.No Republican worth the name can hear the word "revolution" without at least an interior shudder of revulsion. This, I fancied, accounted for that ever so brief pause by the elegant Mrs. Whitman when she was asked to acknowledge that she was in league with Robespierre.
NEWS
By Steve Chapman | November 12, 2002
CHICAGO -- When Republicans shocked the country by winning a majority in both houses of Congress in 1994, you could almost hear the tune that British troops reputedly played after their surrender at Yorktown: "The World Turned Upside Down." The GOP had a mandate for Newt Gingrich's "Contract with America," which called for a balanced budget, term limits and tax cuts. The Republicans talked about abolishing Cabinet departments. They proposed constitutional amendments. The takeover was dubbed the "Republican revolution," because dramatic change was plainly on the way. This year, they have upended expectations once again, giving them an even stronger position in Washington than eight years ago. They recaptured the Senate, they increased their majority in the House in defiance of historical odds -- and this time, they have an incumbent president whose claim to govern is now firmer than when he came into office as the runner-up in the 2000 popular vote.
NEWS
By GARRISON KEILLOR | October 25, 2007
There is a natural division of labor in politics: The Republicans fuss about the sanctity of marriage and getting God back in the schools and the Democrats about health care and $8 billion that vanished in Iraq a few years ago, and so far the Republicans are doing a better job. God is in the schools, the same as He is in Nebraska or even in Dallas, and marriage looks to be doing OK, since the White House is not in charge of it. Meanwhile, the Pentagon and...
NEWS
By Karen Hosler and Karen Hosler,SUN NATIONAL STAFF | December 5, 1999
WASHINGTON -- Plans for a gala celebration of the fifth anniversary of the Republican takeover of Congress were squelched recently because no one knew what to do about former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.Gingrich virtually personifies the Republican revolution, as it was called. But he was deposed by his own troops last year and was later revealed to be having an affair that has embroiled him in a messy divorce."I can't imagine having an anniversary celebration without Newt. But if he came, he'd be the story, and no one would want to be in a picture with him," said Rep. Mark E. Souder, an Indiana Republican, reflecting the conflict among his colleagues.