NEWS
December 1, 2011
Peter DuVall's column regarding Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's policy goal of increasing the population of the city is well done ("Grow city's population, but don't stop there," Nov. 28). It gently chastises the mayor for lacking detail. He is right . But the simplicity of the mayor's goal does not make it wrong. I have written several times about the value of establishing the goal of increasing the population of the city. As the column correctly points out, the city has lost population in the last 50-plus years.
NEWS
By Brent Jones | brent.jones@baltsun.com | March 22, 2010
Overall population has declined in Baltimore since 2000, although some communities have flourished, according to Vital Signs, an occasional report that charts trends in neighborhoods by a variety of measurements. The report analyzes data from 80 indicators provided by the city's planning department. About 270 city neighborhoods are broken down into census-tract boundaries, and while the city has lost about 3 percent of its residents since 2000, several communities have experienced a population boom, including downtown (22 percent growth)
NEWS
December 26, 2011
If I drove around Baltimore long enough, I probably could find enough discarded wrapping blowing along the streets to wrap all our family's holiday gifts. In the best-case scenario, all this trash came out of someone's uncovered recycling bin; in the worst case, it's from someone unwrapping presents in a car or outside their home and throwing it in the street. In Baltimore, either of these is a possibility, and because of this and other uninviting features of city it will be hard to add 10,000 new residents over any period of time.
NEWS
January 11, 2012
I'd love to see Baltimore grow, and if immigrants are the answer that's fine with me, as long as they're here legally ("Immigrants key to reaching mayor's population goal," Jan. 9). Yet no matter how hard the mayor tries to increase population, it will be meaningless unless there are good jobs. It's fine Elsa Garcia's husband found some construction work, but it doesn't sound like full-time employment to me. Why is no one suggesting a greater emphasis on vocational training in our schools?
NEWS
By Olivia Bobrowsky and Olivia Bobrowsky,olivia.bobrowsky@baltsun.com | July 1, 2009
Baltimore's population continues to drop, losing 3,231 people during the year that ended July 1, 2008, according to new census estimates released Wednesday. Except for a small uptick in 2006, the city's population has been on a half-century decline. The most recent census figures put Baltimore's population at 636,919. The number is an estimate, calculated by using data from the 2000 census and taking into account births, deaths and immigration. City leaders have annually disputed the census' initial estimates, arguing the numbers are too low. The preliminary count for 2007 was 637,455, but the bureau readjusted the figure to 640,150.
NEWS
By Ben Wattenberg | November 20, 1996
WASHINGTON -- Finally, after all these years of demographic doom-saying, population proliferationism and exponential extrapolated explosionism, comes a new report from the United Nations and a headline in the New York Times: ''World Is Less Crowded Than Expected.''Really? Than expected by whom? Than expected when?Apparently, not expected when it should have been expected by Joseph Chamie, director of the United Nations Population Division, who is quoted in the Times story: ''We had some glimmer that this was occurring several years ago, but we weren't sure if it was simply a blip.