NEWS
March 16, 2011
I never liked House Speaker Michael E. Busch, and I like him even less now. I have always considered Mr. Busch an arrogant sycophant, and he proved it when his staff called Mothers Against Drunk Driving "a bunch of naive do-gooders who just didn't understand how things worked in Annapolis" ("MADD plays by its own rules in Annapolis," March 14). Most Maryland citizens, including those who support MADD, know only too well how things work in Annapolis. We know that the liquor lobby controls many politicians, particularly the big drinkers, and embraces them and their campaigns with generous contributions at election time.
NEWS
By Michael Dresser, The Baltimore Sun | March 14, 2011
MADD can be maddening. In a legislative fight, advocates from Mothers against Drunk Driving don't always play by Annapolis rules. This has been a source of immense frustration to the Democratic leadership of the House of Delegates. While the Senate threw off the influence of the liquor industry last year and voted overwhelmingly for a tough, MADD-backed bill requiring the installation of ignition interlock devices on the vehicles of all convicted drunken drivers, House leaders balked and the bill died.
NEWS
By Don Markus, The Baltimore Sun | December 22, 2010
Police wanted criminal charges filed against a woman who they believed supplied alcohol to underage drinkers at her Ellicott City home the night last year that 17-year-old Steven Dankos was killed in a drunken-driving accident, according to prosecutors. A Howard County District Court commissioner refused, and Linda Stapf was given a citation instead. That procedural dispute led to prosecutors' agreeing Wednesday in Howard County District Court to Judge Mary C. Reese's putting Stapf's case on the inactive docket, where it will stay as long as Stapf attends a victim impact panel hosted by Mothers Against Drunk Driving.
FEATURES
April 26, 2010
There is a reason that tough drunk-driving legislation has a difficult time passing in Annapolis – that is, besides House Judiciary Committee Chairman Joseph F. Vallario Jr. The problem is that the people pushing for such bills are too nice, too squeaky-clean, too public-spirited. They're do-gooders. They're not in it for the bucks. And that makes some legislators uncomfortable. Sleazy, self-interested industries they can deal with. Ethically challenged lobbyists-for-hire – even those with felony convictions on the resume – are welcome in all the best back rooms.
NEWS
By Sarah Longwell | November 4, 2009
A proposal from Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) to require ignition interlocks for all drunk-driving offenders in Maryland has received a lot of support lately, including in this newspaper. At first glance it might seem like a good way to get drunks off the road, but there is an important argument to be made against the mandatory use of these devices in the cars of all offenders. Ignition interlocks are in-car Breathalyzers that prevent a vehicle from starting if its driver's breath registers above a pre-set blood-alcohol concentration limit.
BUSINESS
By KNIGHT RIDDER/TRIBUNE | February 24, 2005
DETROIT - General Motors Corp., a lightning rod for criticism about everything from air pollution to auto quality, has become a target for, of all things, one of its charitable efforts - its financial and political push to combat drunken driving. A national campaign, MADDatGM, has begun with the backing of 17,000 bars, taverns and liquor stores to attack the automaker and Mothers Against Drunk Driving, mostly for their successful effort to lower the national blood-alcohol standard for drunken driving.