NEWS
By J. Joseph Curran Jr. | June 3, 2009
Ten years ago this spring, two teenagers in Colorado gunned down fellow students and teachers in a killing spree that left 15 dead, 24 injured, and a nation horrified that such carnage could unfold at an American high school. In the decade since, there have been a million gun casualties in the United States. After the Columbine tragedy, I issued a report, "A Farewell to Arms," calling for the country finally to address gun violence head on. I recommended a number of measures: closing the gun show loophole, harnessing new technologies to make guns safer, allowing law enforcement to use body wires to catch straw purchasers, to name a few. I further proposed that while hunting and other recreational uses of firearms should remain unfettered, our long-term goal should be an end to unrestricted handgun ownership.
NEWS
By DAN RODRICKS | April 26, 2009
Gun enthusiasts feel a need to keep arguing for their right to bear as many firearms as possible when, as noted in this column recently, the battle is over, with the all-guns-at-all-costs crowd victorious. Their achievement is an estimated 280 million firearms in a nation of about 307 million people, a stunning ratio that guarantees continued gun violence well beyond the bloody spring we're having this year. That connection is what seems to set the enthusiasts off - that the all-guns-at-all-costs lobby is somehow responsible for all the American bloodshed.
NEWS
June 27, 2008
A majority of the U.S. Supreme Court is more in sync with the opinions of ordinary Americans on gun ownership than one might think. Nearly three out of five Americans said recently that they would oppose a law that banned the sale of handguns like the Washington, D.C., legislation struck down by the court yesterday. 59% OPPOSE A BAN ON HANDGUN SALES But most Americans say that in general, it is more important to control gun ownership than to protect the rights of gun owners, a recent Pew Center for People and the Press survey shows.
NEWS
By Leonard Pitts Jr. | February 17, 2008
You have no right to read this. The First Amendment gives me the right to write it but doesn't necessarily give you the right to read it. Or so I was once told by an attorney. While the right to free speech certainly implies a corresponding right to hear what is being spoken, he said, the First Amendment doesn't explicitly grant such a right. So theoretically, it could be argued that no such right exists. The key word being "theoretically." As a practical matter, the freedom to read whatever we choose is such an intrinsic part of our national character as to make legal theory superfluous.
NEWS
By Joe Burris | April 18, 2007
A compilation of comments from media and others overseas in reaction to the U.S. college shooting: From the Melbourne, Australia, Herald Sun's commentary section: "Sadly, Australians are no strangers to the shock being felt in America today. It echoes the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, in which Martin Bryant shot dead 35 people. After that tragedy, newly elected Prime Minister John Howard courageously took on the local gun lobby to introduce tough new gun laws. Yesterday, Mr. Howard reaffirmed his determination to discourage an American-style gun culture arising here.
NEWS
By CYNTHIA PARKER | April 9, 2007
ATLANTA -- Last Tuesday, a man followed a woman into a downtown Atlanta hotel - in the same complex as CNN's headquarters - and shot her in the face and upper body, leaving her fatally wounded. He, in turn, was shot by a security guard and remained hospitalized late last week. The victim, Clara Riddles, worked at the hotel, but the rage that radiated from her assailant, Arthur Mann, was apparently personal. Family members say the two had been dating, but Ms. Riddles had recently broken it off. What propelled the shooting into national headlines was that it happened in the same building occupied by hundreds of CNN staffers, and it was also near a major sports venue where college basketball's Final Four tournament had ended the night before.
NEWS
By CHILDS WALKER | August 17, 2006
When former Maryland basketball player Lonny Baxter was arrested near the White House and charged with carrying an unlicensed handgun yesterday morning, the incident was news locally but didn't get much play nationally. Baxter isn't a high-profile player. That's part of it. But there's also the fact that his arrest was only the latest in a numbing string of incidents involving athletes and guns. Just a week ago in Ohio, police say they found four loaded guns in Maurice Clarett's truck after a high-speed chase that ended when they pepper-sprayed the former Ohio State football star.
NEWS
May 31, 2002
Constitution allows limits to gun rights Cal Thomas' column emphasizing the historical background of gun rights as an individual right seems to forget that the Second Amendment grants a right to bear arms to a "well-regulated militia" ("Individual gun right grounded in history," Opinion Commentary, May 22). Most legal scholars know this phrase gives state and federal governments the right to place reasonable restrictions on gun ownership to ensure the militia is "well-regulated." Criminals and others for whom gun ownership is dangerous thus are not generally allowed access to firearms.
NEWS
May 17, 2002
Constitution protects rights of gun owners Jules Witcover asserts that U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft changed the Justice Department's interpretation of the Second Amendment based solely on his "personal views" ("Ashcroft's gun views now policy," Opinion Commentary, May 10). In fact, this reversal of policy occurred in light of overwhelming historical evidence documented over the last two decades that the Second Amendment was intended to protect the firearm rights of all law-abiding citizens.
NEWS
By Jules Witcover | May 10, 2002
WASHINGTON -- More than a year ago, when former Sen. John Ashcroft testified at his confirmation hearings to be attorney general, he bent over backward to assure the Senate Judiciary Committee that if he got the job he would put his personal views on such issues as abortion and gun rights behind him and just carry out the laws on the books. As Mr. Ashcroft put it then, he recognized he would be moving from the "enactment-oriented role" of a legislator to a "law-oriented role" as head of the Justice Department and the nation's chief law-enforcement officer.