NEWS
By Marta H. Mossburg | June 28, 2009
Maryland legislators are all for transparency when it comes to those who work outside of the government. But they prefer to hide from scrutiny when it comes to their own finances and affiliations. State senators and delegates failed to pass a law in the 2008 legislative session requiring state officials to file financial disclosure documents electronically and ignored it in the most recent session. They so despise disclosure that the bill (SB190) did not pass even after an amendment exempting elected officials was added.
NEWS
July 7, 2008
As government forms go, the 17-page financial disclosure required of members of the General Assembly is unambiguous. Lawmakers must list not only outside employment and investments but also gifts worth $20 or more. The ethics requirements of counties and other local government are typically just as crystal clear: Elected officials must not only report income but also recuse themselves from matters in which they have a direct financial stake. So while it's unwise to rush to judgment in the continuing federal investigation into state Sen. Ulysses Currie, the information that's come to light so far strongly suggests that the longtime Prince George's County lawmaker did not meet this minimum standard.
NEWS
By Gadi Dechter | March 6, 2008
A project manager at the state Department of the General Services has been referred to the attorney general's office for criminal investigation because of repeated conflict-of-interest findings by legislative auditors, officials said yesterday. It is the second audit finding in three months of potential employee ethics violations at the Department of General Services. The state agency manages state buildings and hires and supervises private contractors who build facilities for Maryland government agencies with public money.
NEWS
By Andrew A. Green | July 20, 2007
Maryland gets a grade of "D" when it comes to the information governors are required to provide about their finances, according to a national watchdog group. The Center for Public Integrity, a Washington-based nonprofit dedicated to making the nation's institutions more transparent, gave the state a marginal rating of 62.5 on a 100-point scale measuring how extensively governors are required to report their personal finances and how accessible those records are to the public. Leah Rush, the center's director of state projects, said full disclosure allows people to know whether elected officials are acting in the public's interest or in their own. "Getting this information out in the public domain is an important function as far as gaining the public's trust in their government to be open about all the different hats public officials wear," she said.
NEWS
By Andrew A. Green | December 13, 2006
The Maryland Ethics Commission has failed to review thousands of financial disclosure forms submitted by state employees and in many cases hasn't checked to make sure they were filed at all, state auditors reported yesterday. More than 11,000 state workers, elected officials and board appointees are required to file the forms annually to ensure that any business interests and outside employment involving them and their families do not pose a conflict with state affairs. But auditors concluded that the Ethics Commission doesn't have nearly enough staff or technical resources to check that the paperwork is accurate or complete.
NEWS
By Jonathan D. Rockoff | October 17, 2006
WASHINGTON -- Former FDA Commissioner Lester M. Crawford, who was charged by federal prosecutors yesterday with lying about owning stock and options in companies regulated by the agency, will plead guilty to two misdemeanors today, his lawyer said. Public corruption prosecutors with the U.S. attorney's office said Crawford failed to disclose tens of thousands of dollars in income from exercising options, selling stock and earning dividends in Pepsico and other companies while holding top jobs at the Food and Drug Administration.
NEWS
By JONATHAN D. ROCKOFF | February 10, 2006
WASHINGTON -- Nearly all senior staff members of the Food and Drug Administration who sought permission to consult, lecture or perform other activities outside the agency from 2000 to 2003 filed incomplete applications, making it difficult to determine whether the work created conflicts of interest, according to a government review released yesterday. The agency approved almost half the applications after the activities had begun, said the report by the Department of Health and Human Services inspector general.
NEWS
By DOUG DONOVAN | February 9, 2006
Despite assertions to the contrary, Baltimore City Council President Sheila Dixon did not abstain from voting on city government contracts awarded to a minority-owned firm that employs her sister. Board of Estimates records show that Dixon voted three times in the past two years on a contract that ultimately awarded nearly $1 million of subcontracts to her sister's employer. The city's ethics law prohibits public officials from participating in "any matter" that involves a sibling's interest or the interest of a relative's employer.
NEWS
By DOUG DONOVAN | February 7, 2006
Baltimore City Council President Sheila Dixon made a mistake by not disclosing that her sister works for a company that is regulated by city government, officials from the president's office said yesterday. An article in The Sun on Monday revealed that Dixon had not disclosed her sister's employment with fiber optic cable firm Utech, a minority subcontractor for Comcast of Baltimore, the city's cable provider. Baltimore's ethics laws require public officials to disclose whether siblings or other relatives work for companies that do business or are regulated by the city.
NEWS
By Mary Curtius and Richard Simon | June 15, 2005
WASHINGTON - Erasing a lingering financial burden, former President Clinton and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton paid off their last legal debts in 2004 arising from investigations of them during their White House years, a financial statement released yesterday showed. In her annual Senate financial disclosure statement, Senator Clinton, a New York Democrat, reported that the couple had paid off the legal fees - which for 2003 they listed as between $500,000 and $1 million - for their defenses in investigations.