February 15, 2012
The Sun's article on Catholic bishops' opposition to the Obama administration's requirement that religious schools and hospitals include contraceptives in their health insurance plans was one-sided and unfair ("Obama's 'accommodation' wins support in birth-control debate," Feb. 11). First, providing birth-control to people without proven medical conditions is a pure "give away" of precious medical funds. If this plan is reasonable, why not support "public/private safety" by providing everyone with cell phones?
February 19, 2012
In response to Max Romano's commentary regarding the "right" to birth control, to which constitutional right does he refer? I searched my copy of the Constitution and could find no reference to any such right ("The right to birth control," Feb. 15). There are so many holes in his argument I hardly know where to begin. Start with "reproductive justice," whatever that is. Men and women do indeed have control over their future, sexual or otherwise; it's called making responsible decisions, not depending on a government mandate.
March 6, 2012
Maybe it's time we change the name of the birth control pill. What Rush Limbaugh doesn't understand is that women are not always about men. The so-called "pill" has been out for over 50 years now, and we aren't going to give it up. It changed our lives. We are in control, and it's not always about not getting pregnant. It really should be called "the regulator," or perhaps the "health pill. " There are many benefits for going on this course of medicine. We can control our periods (something men don't understand)
August 9, 2012
The recent mass shootings in Colorado and Wisconsin have produced the usual response to gun-control advocates: That this is not the "proper" time to discuss such a serious issue. But now is precisely the time to have that discussion, and for the President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, to show they can be the statesmen the country needs and deserves. The candidates should hold a joint news conference and announce that whoever wins the election will back legislation to stop the proliferation of military-grade weapons and accessories.
March 14, 2012
I have to totally agree with Susan Reimer 's assertion that Democrats must be living in a lovely dream waiting for the November elections ("Women will remember in November," March 12). True, some Republican presidential hopefuls have come down with foot in mouth disease, and there seems to be no shortage of eyebrow raising sound bites coming from the endless parade of televised debates. However, it's not the gaffes or the "I shouldn't have said that" moments that are making Democrats salivate for the coming elections but the realization that once again, the women's vote will lock onto a single issue and make it a major election point.
January 17, 2013
Given the typically biased and incomplete information given out by the media on liberal progressive issues such as gun control, it's no wonder Marylander voters polled strongly in support of controls on assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition magazines are needed to prevent killings like those at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. ("Marylanders strongly support two gun control measures," Jan. 14). But before any new restrictions on rifles and ammunition clips are passed in Maryland, everyone, especially the governor and state lawmakers, should step back, take a deep breath and review the statistics on the weapons used in Maryland homicides.
February 5, 2014
I enjoyed reading your editorial about the Beretta company building a new plant in Tennessee ( "Weighing the loss of Beretta jobs," Jan. 30). The problem is that even the cities that attempted to ban handguns entirely were among the most violent in the nation, so it is foolish to think that gun control laws have any effect on crime. Moreover, the violence is being committed by residents, so you one can't claim that legal gun owners are coming in and taking advantage. Clearly, something else must be causing the problem.
August 22, 2011
If someone's going to use your name and/or photo in an advertisement, you'd want to know about it, right? Well, you might want to check your account settings on Linkedin, if you use that social networking service. I was intrigued to find out from this blogger that Linkedin's default settings permit "Social Advertising" that allows the network to pair your image and name with advertisements that show up on the site for people in your network. Not interested in this feature?
September 11, 2012
Editor: I have to chuckle at the article where Mr. Slutzky says he is taking the blame for the salary increase for the Council Administrator. What is up with that? The salary is listed in the Department Staff Summary of the Budget 2013. The salary is plainly stated going from $72K to $95K. Not clear about the $120K+ salary, whether that is salary and benefits or just salary. If it is just salary, then 2 raises in one year, less than 3 months apart??? Not good. In addition, the Assistant Council Administrator is earning $75,000 in 2013. You could sure buy a lot of police officers or teachers for the price of the Chief of Staff and his two deputies and the eight or nine council staff that didn't exist a year ago!
November 26, 2002
Baltimore Police Commissioner Edward Norris says, in a new video being shown to officers at daily roll call, that it's time to really put the screws to criminals in the city. Show them who's in control. Stop them from terrorizing with impunity. He's absolutely right. But even as the video is distributed, officers in one precinct mourn a detective who was killed in apparent retaliation for putting a criminal away. Last week, four officers were gunned down while serving a warrant. And a month ago, an east-side firebombing silenced six members of the Dawson family, who'd been standing up to the criminals on their block, trying to help police get control.