NEWS
July 15, 1991
How serious is Maryland about pursuing its goal of becoming a center for biotechnology and the new life sciences technologies of the 21st century?The Schaefer administration is totally committed. So are other government officials, businessmen and academic leaders in the Baltimore and Washington regions. But the General Assembly? It seems to be having trouble making up its mind whether any money should be spent on such scientific ventures.Take the Maryland Bioprocessing Center, a groundbreaking enterprise that holds enormous potential for turning this region into a hotbed of scientific development.
NEWS
January 7, 1991
Even in a time of recession and budget deficits, some projects just cannot be shelved for very long: road and bridge repairs, rescuing cultural resources such as the Peabody Conservatory and projects that eventually could pave the way to major new economic growth, such as the proposed $17-million Maryland Bioprocessing Facility, a priority item for the Department of Economic and Employment Development.Here's why: Maryland, a national leader in biotechnology research, looks to its major assets, the National Institutes of Health, Johns Hopkins and the University of Maryland, to provide critical mass for entrepreneurial spinoffs.
BUSINESS
By David Conn and David Conn,Annapolis Bureau of The Sun | March 5, 1991
ANNAPOLIS -- Maryland's biotechnology community made at least three big mistakes in the last century or so: Dramamine, Bufferin and Sweet 'n Lo.Actually, those weren't the mistakes. They were wildly successful products developed from inventions or discoveries made at the University of Maryland and the Johns Hopkins University, according to Thomas Chmura, deputy director of the Greater Baltimore Committee.The mistakes came when state, academic and private sector leaders let the technology go to manufacturers outside Maryland, forfeiting thousands of jobs and countless billions of dollars in revenues, Mr. Chmura said.
NEWS
By Martina McGloughlin | November 3, 1999
I AGREE with Greenpeace that we need to feed and clothe the world's people while minimizing the impact of agriculture on the environment. But the human population continues to grow, while arable land is a finite quantity.So unless we will accept starvation or placing parks and the Amazon Basin under the plow, there really is no alternative to applying biotechnology to agriculture.Today's biotechnology differs significantly from previous agricultural technologies. Using genetic engineering, scientists can enhance the nutritional content, texture, color, flavor, growing season, yield, disease resistance and other properties of production crops.
BUSINESS
By Timothy J. Mullaney | January 29, 1991
Maryland has been slow to turn its edge in biotechnolog research into new products, companies and jobs, according to a Greater Baltimore Committee report released yesterday.More help is needed to transfer technology discovered at local universities and federal research institutions out of the ivory tower and into the marketplace, the GBC said."This is the decade when things are supposed to take off," said Elizabeth K. Nitze, a consultant who was principal author of the report. In the 1990s, biotech companies nationwide expect to introduce an array of new products based on 1980s research, she said.
BUSINESS
By Michelle Fay and Michelle Fay,Bloomberg Business News | November 11, 1992
WASHINGTON -- Investors have turned their attention and their money back to the biotechnology industry.Renewed interest in the sector, which has taken a beating thus far in 1992, doesn't follow any dramatic announcements, analysts said. Rather, it reflects the low cost of the stocks, potential new products and hopes for better days under President-elect Bill Clinton's leadership, they said.The American Stock Exchange's Biotechnology Index rose 9.03 points, to 168.38, Monday, a three-month high, and continued the gain yesterday.