NEWS
By Jeremy J. Stone | March 27, 1992
RONALD REAGAN had two dreams, not just one, involving ballistic missiles. An interlocked complex of industrial, military and congressional interests is keeping alive his dream of a "Star Wars" defense. But how many pursue his dream to replace "these God-awful missiles" through disarmament?President Bush and Russian President Boris Yeltsin talk of their "alliance" as "partners." With circumstances so changed for the better, we must now revisit Reagan's visionary proposal at Reykjavik.Elimination of nuclear-armed ballistic missiles, on a worldwide basis, would certainly be a cheaper and more reliable solution than defense against them, not only for us but for a dozen other states.
NEWS
By NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE | April 30, 1999
WASHINGTON -- The United States has decided to sell an early warning radar system to Taiwan that would allow the Taiwanese to monitor the launch of Chinese ballistic missiles or manned bombers, Clinton administration officials said yesterday.The sale has drawn protests from Beijing and was opposed by a group of mid-level administration officials who believed that it would worsen recent tensions between Washington and Beijing.The administration approved the sale at the recommendation of senior policy-makers from the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon who believed that China's deployment of large numbers of short-range missiles along its coastline posed a serious military threat to Taiwan, officials said.
NEWS
By George F. Will | June 11, 2000
WASHINGTON -- Al Gore may be assuming that the country's complacency about peace in our (and our children's and grandchildren's) time, and the administration's charade concerning defense against ballistic missiles, will prevent this from becoming an important campaign issue. To understand why it should be a central issue, consider two hypotheticals: After Congress approves normalized trade relations with China, Beijing moves militarily against Taiwan. China invokes the possibility of a nuclear response if the United States interferes, and the U.S. president, governing a nation incapable of defending itself from even a single ballistic missile, is militarily paralyzed.
NEWS
By Patrick E. Tyler and Patrick E. Tyler,New York Times News Service | March 6, 1992
WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration in recent days has examined the military option of boarding two North Korean cargo ships heading for Iran loaded with Scud-C ballistic missiles for the arsenals of Syria and Iran, administration officials said yesterday.The option, which has been discussed in the Pentagon, State Department and White House, is under active consideration by President Bush and his senior national security aides, but no decisions have been made, the officials said.The military planning follows State Department criticism of North Korea last month for shipping these missiles, which are still on the high seas aboard two ships.
NEWS
By Jane's Defense Weekly | November 1, 1991
IN A race to disarm, the United States and the Soviet Union have promised to destroy practically all tactical nuclear weapons in their arsenals.NATO defense ministers have also agreed on nuclear-arms cuts to reduce the stockpile of tactical nuclear weapons in Europe by 80 percent.Even France, not a member of NATO's military command, announced in August that it would cut back production -- from 120 to 30 -- of its new short-range nuclear missile, the Hades.But all these countries have left anti-missile systems off their disarmament lists.
NEWS
January 15, 1991
The gun lobby suffered a well-deserved defeat yesterday when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to recognize a constitutional right to own machine guns. The justices let stand without comment a lower court ruling that said Congress had prohibited individuals from possessing or transferring such weapons in 1986.The high court's action was the only reasonable response. The gun lobby has persistently claimed an absolute constitutional right to possess firearms. Yet in 200 years, the court has never interpreted the Second Amendment to mean that individuals have an unlimited right to "keep and bear arms."