Manning guilty of violating Espionage Act, not guilty of aiding the enemy

Sentencing phase begins Wednesday; ex-Marylander could get 136 years

July 30, 2013|By Matthew Hay Brown and Jean Marbella, The Baltimore Sun

A military judge ruled Tuesday that Army Pfc. Bradley E. Manning violated the Espionage Act when he gave a trove of classified material to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks to publish online.

But Army Col. Denise Lind found the onetime Marylander not guilty of aiding the enemy — the most serious charge brought by the government, which carries a possible life sentence.

Manning, 25, could still be sentenced to decades in prison for leaking hundreds of thousands of war logs, diplomatic cables and battlefield video footage in the largest security breach in U.S. history. Maximum terms for the 20 counts of espionage, theft and disobeying regulations on which he was convicted add up to 136 years behind bars.

The sentencing phase of his court-martial is scheduled to begin Wednesday at Fort Meade. Both sides can present arguments. Manning, who did not testify during the eight-week trial phase, may speak before Lind orders a punishment.

On Tuesday, the slight, bespectacled soldier stood at attention as Lind read her verdict on each of the 21 counts. Manning remained impassive, but his attorney smiled faintly when Lind ruled that he was not guilty of aiding the enemy.

He is expected to appeal the rest of the findings.

The proceeding has drawn worldwide attention to the small courtroom on the Army base in Anne Arundel County.

To his supporters, Manning is a whistle-blower whose release of gun-sight video footage of a U.S. helicopter crew killing civilians in Baghdad and laughing revealed evidence of a possible war crime. To others, he is a traitor whose release of classified materials endangered American lives.

His court-martial unfolded as disclosures by another young intelligence worker provoked a continuing debate over national security, government secrecy and privacy rights. Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor who revealed details of secret U.S. telephone and Internet surveillance programs, called Manning "a classic whistle-blower."

In a statement, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange called Manning's espionage conviction "an example of national security extremism."

"It is a short-sighted judgment that cannot be tolerated and must be reversed," Assange said from the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, where he has been living to avoid extradition to Sweden to face allegations of sex crimes. "It can never be that conveying true information to the public is 'espionage.'"

Daniel Benjamin, until last year the State Department's chief counterterrorism official, called the belief of Manning's supporters that he was working for the greater good "perverse."

"We need to have whistle-blowers who illuminate wrongdoing. But they focus on specific deeds, such as My Lai" — the massacre of Vietnamese civilians by U.S. troops. "[Manning] didn't focus. He dropped 750,000 documents on the public. This was a profoundly reckless act.

"If you can talk about vandalism against the U.S.' standing in the world ... this was it," said Benjamin, who now heads the John Sloan Dickey Center for International Understanding at Dartmouth College. "Clearly, it's important that he's convicted, and it's important that he's going to be incarcerated for a long time."

Former Air Force attorney Scott L. Silliman, now a professor at Duke Law School, said that "the dialogue is going to go on."

"It's going to continue to be how you look at Bradley Manning," Silliman said. "Is he a hero? Is he someone who did great damage to the country?"

Manning lived with an aunt in Potomac and studied at Montgomery College before he enlisted in the Army in 2007. He served in Iraq from 2009 until his arrest in Baghdad in May 2010.

Before Lind read her verdict, analysts had said that a Manning conviction on aiding the enemy would have expanded the definition of the charge.

Traditionally, the law has been used to prosecute individuals suspected of giving information directly to a U.S. adversary. Manning gave material to WikiLeaks to publish on the Internet.

Prosecutors argued that he knew from his training that al-Qaida and other enemies would see it there. They said Osama bin Laden had asked for the war logs that Manning leaked and that copies were found in the terrorist leader's compound in Pakistan after he was killed by Navy SEALs.

Civil liberties advocates and Manning's supporters argued that a guilty finding would have cast a broad chilling effect on whistle-blowers and the media organizations that publish their revelations.

The Government Accountability Project, which has defended leakers, including former NSA official Thomas Drake, called the not-guilty finding "a just outcome to an unprecedented case of judicial overreach."

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.