Marijuana laws are not constitutional

June 11, 2013

Marijuana remains illegal because the ACLU and NORML do not acknowledge that being arrested is deprivation of liberty and seizing marijuana is deprivation of property ("Md. marijuana arrest rate soars," June 6).

Liberty and property are fundamental rights. Due process of law requires the deprivation of fundamental rights be justified by a compelling state interest to show the marijuana laws are reasonable and necessary.

The constitutionality of the marijuana laws has been determined by rational basis test not by the compelling state interest test.

Criminal laws require strict scrutiny by the court, but injury to fundamental rights and presents an Article III justiciable controversy.

Any marijuana defendant can claim they were deprived of liberty and property without due process of law because there was no threat to the rights of others or to public safety.

Michael J. Dee, Windham, Maine

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.