Maryland's departure raises questions about future of ACC

Conference considered vulnerable to additional raids from leagues fueled by football riches

  • "I think the ACC will have to look at things a little differently because basketball is what made the ACC," says former Terps coach Gary Williams, pictured during the ACC tournament at the Verizon Center in 2005. "It's still a great basketball league."
"I think the ACC will have to look at things a little differently… (Kenneth K. Lam, Baltimore…)
November 21, 2012|By Childs Walker and Don Markus | The Baltimore Sun

The University of Maryland's planned departure from the Atlantic Coast Conference has raised questions about the league's long-term survival, a sobering prospect for fans that grew up on games between the Terps and their Tobacco Road rivals.

The first notes of panic emerged Monday, after Maryland announced plans to leave for the Big Ten and its far greater television riches in 2014. "I think the ACC is vulnerable right now," said Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski in taping his show Basketball and Beyond for Sirius XM Radio. "I'm concerned about our conference."

Speculation immediately followed that the Big Ten might also be wooing North Carolina, Georgia Tech and Virginia and that Florida State, Clemson and Miami would be tasty targets for the Southeastern Conference or the Big 12.

"I could see a number of things like that; the Big Ten is getting more proactive," said ESPN analyst and Duke graduate Jay Bilas. "Do you want to be in this or you don't. It's been building for quite a long time."

Former Maryland basketball coach Gary Williams said the ACC has too much pedigree to collapse but added that he wouldn't be surprised by more shake-ups.

"I think the shock value shouldn't be there anymore if anyone goes anywhere," Williams said. "Nothing is sacred anymore. I'm probably as big an ACC person as can be having played in it and coached in it and believe me, I have my memories and I have my great feelings about the ACC which I'll always have. But at the same time, Maryland is in a situation where this is in their best interest overall because of the financial situation and the fact that they're not downgrading at all academically in what they're doing."

It's another chapter in a story that has come to loom over college sports, with some analysts predicting an eventual landscape of four superconferences in which every other league is a mid-major.

"We're really happy in the ACC," said Notre Dame president Rev. John Jenkins in an interview this week with the Chronicle of Higher Education. "But I am concerned about continual instability of this conference situation."

John Swofford declined comment, but a source with knowledge of his reaction told The Baltimore Sun Wednesday night that the ACC commissioner has spoken to a majority of the presidents of the remaining schools — including those that have been mentioned as possible candidates to follow Maryland — "and they're more committed than ever to staying in the conference."

The source went on to say that the $50 million exit fee that was raised from $20 million when Notre Dame joined as a part-time member is "non-negotiable." As for the possibility of founding member North Carolina and Virginia following Maryland to the Big Ten, the source said "that is crazy." Since Syracuse and Pittsburgh announced that they were joining the ACC, other schools have made similar inquiries, the source said.

Bilas said the ACC should have been more proactive and gone beyond snatching Pittsburgh and Syracuse away from the crumbling Big East.

"I would have gone to the SEC and formed a 24-school superleague," Bilas said. "It would have been radical at the time. With all the natural rivalries you would have had, with the SEC in football, it made much more geographic sense. You'd better think boldly in this because it's not going to be good enough for your league to accept what's going to be left out there."

Maryland's move stunned ACC officials, who didn't know it was coming until news reports emerged Friday and Saturday. The league had raised its fee for exiting schools from $20 million to $50 million in September, believing that the new sum would be dissuasive. But Maryland president Wallace Loh, who had voted against the fee increase, spoke of it as a modest inconvenience in the face of the revenues projected to flow from the Big Ten.

The move also stunned Maryland students, alumni and boosters. Even those in Loh's inner circle reacted negatively when he first raised the possibility less than two weeks ago. But as cold reason began to sweep aside the initial emotions, powerful Maryland supporters cited the potential instability of the ACC as a reason for supporting the move.

"There is real concern that the ACC won't be around as a major player after the upcoming conference shuffle," said Richard L. Jaklitsch, a Prince George's County attorney and former president of the Terrapin Club. "Maryland is getting a great deal to make the move now before other schools abandon ship."

It was a sudden turnabout for the ACC, which hadn't lost a member since South Carolina departed in 1971. The conference had been predator rather than prey as the landscape of college athletics shifted in recent years, poaching Miami, Virginia Tech, Boston College, Notre Dame, Syracuse and Pittsburgh from the Big East. Those moves seemed to ensure the ACC's dominance of the East Coast and to guarantee its basketball pre-eminence for years to come.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.