Constellation shareholders reject Shattuck's pay

Shareholders criticize pay at annual meeting

May 27, 2011|By Hanah Cho, The Baltimore Sun

Constellation Energy Group shareholders registered their opposition Friday to the pay package of Chief Executive Officer Mayo A. Shattuck III, sending a strong message of disapproval to the company's leadership after a year in which it lost nearly $1 billion.

The Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. parent's board of directors is not bound by the result of the shareholders' first-ever "say on pay" vote; the board approved the compensation package for Shattuck and other senior executives earlier this year.

But it amounted to a symbolic blow to Constellation, which has come under criticism in recent years for its pay practices.

In a year when shareholders at most U.S. companies are getting their first opportunity to cast advisory votes on compensation plans, most pay packages are winning support. Investors of McCormick & Co. and Under Armour have approved millions of dollars in pay for CEOs Alan D. Wilson and Kevin Plank.

Constellation investors holding 61 percent of the 156 million shares casting votes at the company's annual meeting Friday opposed the company's compensation plan.

The French utility EDF, Constellation's largest investor, voted no with its 7 percent stake. Two influential shareholder groups had advised others to do the same.

Some shareholders challenged Shattuck's management of the company through a decade of ups and downs, several merger attempts and a near bankruptcy in 2008. He brokered the sale of the company to Chicago-based Exelon Corp., a deal worth $7.9 billion.

Former state Sen. Julian L. Lapides, a 40-year Constellation stockholder, told Shattuck it was "unconscionable" for the company to award such large salaries when its stock lost more than 60 percent of its value in the past several years. Lapides suggested that Constellation executive pay should have been cut by the same percentage.

"I'm disappointed in the company and the management, and extremely disappointed in the compensation awarded to the black suits," said Lapides, who said he was attending his first annual meeting. "The public's perception is you all are getting windfalls."

Lapides also questioned whether the board "serves as a rubber stamp to the management."

Shattuck's total compensation last year was valued at $15.7 million, according to regulatory filings, up from $10.9 million in 2009. Much of the year-over-year increase came from changes in the accounting value of his pension and deferred earnings. Excluding that accounting change of $4.9 million, Shattuck was paid $10.8 million in base salary, cash incentive, stocks, options and perks.

Constellation posted a loss of $982.6 million last year, due in part to the reduced value of its nuclear power business. The company reported a profit of $4.4 billion in 2009.

Shattuck said he expected "some angst" over executive compensation. He defended the board's independence.

"Despite what you read, we have a very performance-based plan," Shattuck said in response to Lapides.

One shareholder who supported Shattuck told him, "You're the right man at the right place at the right time."

Shattuck received last year a base salary and cash incentive payment of $3 million. Constellation says payouts of his stocks and options are not guaranteed. Officials say 87 percent of Shattuck's compensation is based on meeting performance goals.

A company spokesman said the package is "fully aligned with shareholder interest."

Asked how the board might respond to the shareholders' disapproval, spokesman Lawrence McDonnell said it "looks at compensation on an ongoing basis and will continue to do so."

Executive pay in corporate America is on the rise again after declining in 2008 and 2009.

Total CEO compensation at S&P 500 companies rose 28.2 percent in 2010, according to consulting firm Equilar. Median CEO pay is now $9 million.

In most cases where compensation packages did not win shareholder support, analyst Carol Bowie said, investors were swayed by "prolonged poor performance and unjustified high CEO pay."

Even some companies with positive performance did not garner enough votes for their executive compensation if pay was perceived to be out of line, said Bowie, head of compensation policy development at ISS, one of the firms that advised Constellation shareholders to vote against Shattuck's pay.

The 25 other large companies that have failed to win support for executive pay practices represent less than 2 percent of firms that have held "say on pay" votes this year, according to ISS.

In recommending that Constellation investors oppose the company's compensation package, ISS and Glass, Lewis & Co. said the pay was out of line with performance last year. ISS said a $100 investment in Constellation at the end of 2006 had fallen in value to $50.80 last year.

"In most cases, [shareholders] are focused on companies that haven't delivered performance but don't seem to be reflected in executive pay," Bowie said.

Gov. Martin O'Malley and some lawmakers have quarreled with Constellation over executive pay.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.