(Page 2 of 2)

Hospital CEOs get seven-figure salaries, country club memberships

Critics question whether nonprofits should pay so handsomely

August 28, 2010|By Andrea K. Walker, The Baltimore Sun

Tolmie resigned in May 2009 after being on administrative leave to avoid a conflict of interest during a federal investigation. Since then, one of the hospital's cardiologists, Dr. Mark G. Midei, has been accused of performing hundreds of unnecessary heart procedures. According to the filing, Midei made $1.3 million in the fiscal year 2009.

St. Joseph officials said it is not unusual for an established physician to make more than a CEO.

"Just as different executives are paid differently according to the market based on specific skills and experience, so, too, are physicians of different specialties compensated differently," the hospital said in a statement. "Thus, it is not unusual for a highly trained specialist in a highly ranked specialty with additional administrative responsibilities, to earn more than the CEO."

Mercy Medical Center head Thomas Mullen made $1.08 million in compensation during fiscal 2009. The hospital said in a statement that it "believes this compensation to be appropriate given the responsibilities of serving as a president and CEO of a $520 million health system."

Edward Miller, CEO of Johns Hopkins Medicine, made $729,297. He also gets paid separately for his position as dean of the School of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University. The fiscal 2009 filing for the medical school was not yet available. But Miller collected $1.4 million for that job the year before.

Ronald R. Peterson, president of Johns Hopkins Health System, earned a total compensation package of $1.9 million in the most recent filing period.

"If you have an organization that wants to be tax-exempt, one of the tradeoffs is you want to be transparent," said Shale D. Stiller, a partner with DLA Piper law firm and head of the compensation committee at Hopkins for almost a decade."If Hopkins wants to be tax-exempt, it has to be more transparent. I don't have any problems with the additional requirement that the 990 makes. Hopkins has always been above-board."

Some compensation packages swelled with severance or retirement benefits triggered by a CEO's exit.

Notebaert, who was the highest-paid CEO in fiscal year 2009, resigned in August 2008 and took home a $7.9 million compensation package, including $5.9 million in severance. Notebaert's compensation also included a financial planner and tax preparer.

Hospital officials have said that Notebaert's compensation was justified because of his experience and accomplishments while working at the medical system. The system added Shore Health System and Chester River Health System to its roster of institutions during Notebaert's tenure. Total profit reached $301 million while he was at the helm, compared with $49 million in the preceding five years, according to the medical system.

Robert A. Chrencik, who took over as CEO after Notebaert's departure, earned more than $1 million in compensation during the reporting period. He was previously the medical system's chief financial officer.

Among the highest paid retirees was James R. Walker, the former president of Baltimore Washington Medical Center, who received a compensation package of $3.4 million that included $2.9 million in retirement benefits.

At GBMC, former CEO Laurence Merlis was compensated $989,624. While other executives received expense accounts of up to $5,000 for club memberships, tuition and health equipment, Merlis got his own discretionary spending account. "The amount of the account was established in his employment agreement and is not required to be substantiated," according to the IRS filing. Merlis retired in January.

Patricia J. Mitchell, chair of the GBMC board's compensation committee, said in a statement that the discretionary spending account "no longer exists." She added that "executive compensation is linked to specific performance measures including clinical quality, patient safety, patient, physician and employee satisfaction and financial results."

While the additional disclosure requirements are expected to shine a brighter spotlight on hospital executive pay, it is unclear whether that will result in change.

The IRS made parts of hospital reporting more transparent, but it weakened others, said Marcus Owens, a partner with law firm Caplin & Drysdale, who was a lawyer with the IRS for 25 years.

Hospitals no longer have to report deferred compensation executives would get if they reached certain anniversary milestones with the company, Owens said. Now they only have to report such compensation when it is actually paid out.

But the new rules do require more information on other business relationships and pay, such as compensation from another entity within a hospital system.

On the state level, officials don't have the authority to tell hospitals what they can pay a CEO.

"We don't say you can only pay $800,000," said Robert Murray, executive director of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission. "They don't have any limitations. If they are able to lower underlying costs and generate profit, they can decide to allocate some of the profit to higher salaries if they want."

This is the first year the commission has looked at executive salaries in such detail, Murray added, saying that the effort will bring attention to the issue.

"It's tremendously important that you don't ignore skyrocketing salaries or special perks when you're making decisions," said Common Cause's O'Donnell.


Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.