As Congress hears testimony about the handling of the Gulf of Mexico spill, scientists and environmentalists question how prepared the government is to respond if a ship or barge were to leak oil into the Chesapeake Bay.
Experts say a quick-fire response is needed to stop oil from spreading in the shallow bay and reaching the shores.
"There is no functioning [emergency response] system on the Bay in the terms of what we call operational. …," said William C. Boicourt, an expert in physical oceanographic processes at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science at Horn Point. He said the center has been working on an early warning system for wind and oil patterns, but such a system is at least two years away.
"We don't know of any detailed plans and response scenarios that are in place that have been practiced that are ready to go at a moment's notice," William C. Baker, president of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said. "Clearly the states and the Coast Guard ought to do more planning."
Coast Guard Lt. Cmdr. Michael J. DaPonte said there are area contingency plans — collective efforts by federal, state and local agencies and industry representatives — to respond to water-related disasters on the bay. But primary responsibility for cleaning any oil spill is the party responsible for the spill and the contractors it hires to do that work, DaPonte said.
He added the Coast Guard is not meant to stand by "like the fire department." If there is an oil spill, the Coast Guard "does not jump to the response – it's the responsible party that has to do that."
But given the narrowness of the bay — it is six to 10 miles at some points — and its shallow bottom — 160 feet at the deepest point — an early warning system would be essential to saving fragile marshes and grasses that are vital to the already pollution-impaired waters, Boicourt said.
While there is no oil drilling on the Chesapeake, container ships and cruise ships carrying large fuel loads constantly traverse the bay, along with fuel-oil-carrying barges and tugs. If a ship or a barge were to hit the Bay Bridge and cause a spill — even one smaller than the BP accident in the Gulf — "you could have a devastating effect" on the large but shallow estuary, Baker said.
The Coast Guard is required to hold area-level, full-scale drills where boom actually splashes water every three years, said Lt. Kristen Preble, chief of the contingency preparedness branch within the Contingency Preparedness and Force Readiness Office at Hampton Roads. The contingency plans cover everything from oil spills to terrorist threats, she said.
The last full-scale drill the Coast Guard conducted in the upper Chesapeake's watershed was three years ago, on the Potomac River, said Coast Guard Lt. Bryan A. Naranjo. That drill was on coping with a scenario of a barge spilling its load of fuel oil destined for delivery to Andrews Air Force base, he said.
A full-scale exercise scheduled for August was postponed until next spring because of the number of personnel and equipment being directed to the Gulf oil disaster, Naranjo said.
Shaun Adamec, a spokesman for Gov. Martin O'Malley, said full-scale first-response exercises beyond scenario discussions would be an "unnecessary use of resources," given that there are no major oil tankers or drilling in the bay, and because of the pressures created by the Gulf spill. He added that equipment exists to deal with oil spills.
The governor has directed his cabinet members who focus on bay issues to insure that the necessary equipment is properly maintained, Adamec said.
Jay Apperson, spokesman for the Maryland Department of the Environment, which Adamec said is charged with maintaining equipment, said it is "prepared and equipped to clean up oil spills."
Apperson said MDE has conducted small water-related spill drills. One drill two years ago on the Susquehanna River and another last month on the Wicomico River were open-water drills.
Another involving the bay itself and another planned for this September off the coast of Delmarva are "table-top" exercises: "Basically people get their plans out and tell each other what they would do in the case of a spill," Apperson said. "It helps make sure the information is up to date."
Fred Millar, an emergency preparedness and homeland security expert, cautioned against the over-reliance on plans that local communities do not understand.
"Plans are plans. If they sit on a shelf and bear no relation to reality and are not communicated to the public, then that means they are useless," said the former member of D.C.'s local emergency planning committee. "One way to make sure that plans are useful is to do drills very frequently, where you run a simulation in a full-scale drill."