Surcharge on downtown properties could rise

Downtown group looks to increase fee on commercial property to keep programs afloat and fund new capital projects

April 19, 2010|By Jamie Smith Hopkins, The Baltimore Sun

Business leaders and landlords are proposing to raise a surcharge on downtown commercial properties this summer to make up for falling property values and to help pay for capital projects such as improving parks, installing additional video cameras and making the city more pedestrian-friendly.

The increased role of the private sector comes as the city may be forced to cut public services. The Downtown Partnership of Baltimore, which runs surcharge-funded programs aimed at keeping the area clean and safe, estimates the proposal would raise more than $1 million a year. That translates to about $300 a year for a three-story mixed-use building and $95,000 for a large Class A office building of 500,000 square feet.

The surcharge funds municipal-type services, from emptying garbage cans to maintaining green spaces. As city government officials scramble to cover a $121 million operating budget shortfall and have less local money to devote to capital projects, businesses will need to step up if they want upgrades in an area that draws more than 150,000 people every day, the Downtown Partnership says.

"There's just not enough capital money to go around for the projects we need," said Kirby Fowler, president of the Downtown Partnership.

"This is a way for downtown to help itself," added Michael Evitts, a spokesman for the nonprofit group.

While privatizing public services in cities has been a trend for years, John K. McIlwain, a senior fellow with the Urban Land Institute in Washington, hasn't heard of businesses in other cities offering to shoulder more costs in the wake of the severe economic downturn.

"It's a difficult thing to try to do because the businesses themselves are suffering," he said. "If you push it too far, you're simply going to shut down more stores."

The recession pushed office vacancies within a mile of downtown Baltimore to nearly 20 percent last year. McIlwain thinks the proposed surcharge increase — and the potential impact on businesses — is pretty modest. The downside is that limits the amount of capital work it could finance.

"When everybody's hurting, how much can you pay to do the longer-term capital improvements?" he said. "Those are tough calls."

The current surcharge is 14.39 cents per $100 in assessed property value, paid by commercial property owners — or their tenants, if that expense is passed on — in the Downtown Management Authority district. The area stretches into parts of Mount Vernon to the north and is roughly bounded by Interstate 83 on the east, Greene Street on the west and Conway Street on the south.

The Downtown Partnership's board has endorsed raising the charge to 21.39 cents per $100 in assessed value. The Downtown Management Authority board, made up of business leaders and property owners, also is in favor of such an increase.

"We know it's something that has to be done," said Michael Haynie, managing director of the Tremonts, the hotel and meeting facilities on St. Paul Place and Charles Street. He sits on the management authority board as a property owner representative. "Downtown is an investment for us, and we have to bite the bullet."

Though the proposal would increase the surcharge nearly 50 percent, the actual increase in owners' bills could be significantly smaller because of declining market values.

The average price per square foot of commercial properties sold in downtown Baltimore during the first three months of the year was about 30 percent less than the average two years earlier, according to real estate information firm CoStar Group. Assessments lag behind the market, but commercial real estate brokers are warning the Downtown Partnership to expect less from the surcharge in the coming years if it isn't raised.

The 7-cent proposed increase would bring in almost $2.2 million a year if assessments don't change. A 15 percent drop in the assessable base — what the Downtown Partnership expects — would shave the net increase to about $1.2 million.

Declining property values would mean less ready cash for capital projects, but the Downtown Partnership also is seeking more authority to borrow money.

Robert Manekin, a Downtown Partnership board member who works in commercial real estate, thinks the proposed surcharge increase is necessary — and probably too small. A 10-cent increase would be better, he said. He wants to see capital improvements downtown, and he's anxious to avoid backsliding.

"There are those of us who remember what the downtown was like before the Downtown Management Authority was created," said Manekin, a senior vice president at Manekin LLC, a commercial real estate services firm that represents landlords and tenants, "and we clearly do not want to return to that condition."

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.