Consensus Fuels New Voting System For Best-picture Oscar

February 05, 2010|By Steven Zeitchik | Steven Zeitchik,Tribune Newspapers

The Oscars are using a preferential voting system this year to determine the best-picture winner. Although attempting to understand the system can sometimes feel a little like trying to divine the secrets of cold fusion, the system is actually logical - sort of.

Whereas all other categories will use the same system used in the past - every voter gets to pick one of the five nominees, and the nominee with the most votes wins - the 10-nominee best-picture category will function differently.

Voters will be asked to rank their best-picture choices from one to 10 (though they are not required to complete the ballot in full). Then the academy will gather the ballots and separate them in piles according to voters' first choices. Each movie gets its own pile - the film that appears most frequently as a first-place choice naturally will have the largest stack, the movie with the next-most first-place votes will have the second-largest, and so forth. Then each stack is counted.

If one film has more than 50 percent of the votes on the first round (unlikely), it will be declared the winner. If it doesn't, the academy will take the shortest stack - the movie that got the fewest first-place votes - eliminate it from contention, remove its stack from the table and redistribute those voters' second choices to the other stacks.

The tally then begins anew: If a film now has passed 50 percent of the ballots (still pretty unlikely), it wins. If it doesn't, the auditors go to the smallest stack left, eliminate that movie, remove that stack, and go down those ballots to voters' next-highest choice (of a movie still in contention, of course), and redistribute the ballots across the piles once again. The process repeats until one stack ends up with a majority.

What all this means in practical terms - apart from a lot of slips of paper - is that, because it's unlikely that auditors will work their way past most voters' fourth or fifth choices before arriving at a winner, it actually could be preferable for a film to garner a lot of second- and third-place votes than to be a polarizing choice that splits evenly between first-place votes and, say, eighth- and ninth-place on the ballot.

That, in turn, means a movie could pull a Bush vs. Gore - win best picture despite not getting the most first-place votes. Although, because the academy guarantees a secret ballot, few people would ever know.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.