January 31, 2010|By Kelly Brewington and Meredith Cohn | Kelly Brewington and Meredith Cohn,Kelly.brewington@baltsun.com and Meredith.Cohn@baltsun.com
Even as a proposal to legalize medical marijuana emerges in Maryland, a backlash over the burgeoning industry has developed in other states - and is likely to influence legislation here.
Last week, the Los Angeles City Council tried to rein in the growth of marijuana dispensaries, limiting the number to 70 and imposing tight restrictions on where and how they can operate. And in Colorado, towns are trying to shutter some of the hundreds of dispensaries that have popped up.
FOR THE RECORD - A photo caption accompanying an article Sunday about medical marijuana misidentified Del. Dan Morhaim's title.
The Sun regrets the error.
But supporters of the Maryland proposal say they have learned from problems in states that approved use of the drug without uniform regulations on the dispensaries providing it. The result, they say: Maryland's measure could be among the most stringent in the nation.
"I looked at a compendium of legislation from all the other states and I knew from being in California that we absolutely didn't want to do that," said Del. Dan Morhaim, a Baltimore County Democrat and a physician who plans to sponsor a bill that would make Maryland the 15th state to allow the medical use of marijuana. "From the physician-patient point of view, I wanted a bill that I would be supportive of as a doctor."
Advocates and some medical experts say a growing body of research shows the drug can be an effective tool to help patients struggling with some diseases. The Maryland proposal would allow marijuana to be given to patients with a "debilitating medical condition," such as seizures, severe chronic pain or severe nausea as a result of cancer treatment.
But not all physicians agree it's a good idea.
Dr. Kevin Cullen, an oncologist and director of the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, isn't sure the state needs a new law. He said he'd probably never recommend medical marijuana to cancer patients because other drugs are more effective.
"It's important that the lawmakers speak to the medical community directly and assess the need for this," he said. "It may be that they're having a 'me, too' reaction to other states. I have no idea who the lobby may be for this."
Unlike laws in some other states, the proposal Morhaim discussed last week would license growers and dispensaries, would allow doctors to recommend marijuana only to patients with whom they have a long-standing relationship and would control who could provide the drug to homebound patients. People would not be able to grow their own marijuana and would be limited in the amount they could buy each month as well as the ailments they could use it for.
(Sen. David Brinkley, a Republican from Frederick, is the measure's sponsor in the Senate.)
Morhaim, a longtime medical-marijuana supporter, said this legislative session is the right time to pursue the change.
Last fall, the American Medical Association urged the federal government to downgrade its classification of marijuana from a dangerous drug with no medical use, clearing the way for more clinical research of the drug and development of cannabis-based medicines.
At the same time, access to medical marijuana has been growing nationwide since the Obama administration loosened federal enforcement of the drug last fall, saying it would not prosecute users in states with medical marijuana laws. With other states legalizing medical marijuana, Maryland had an opportunity to study their successes and missteps.
In crafting the measure in the House of Delegates, Morhaim, who is originally from Los Angeles, looked at that city's experience with medical marijuana as an example of what not to do.
Because California's 1996 law legalizing medical marijuana did not regulate dispensaries or set up a means for distributing the drug, localities had to come up with rules on their own. While cities such as Oakland mandated regulation of dispensaries, including restrictions on where and how they can operate, Los Angeles left the question open; storefront dispensaries with on-site doctors flourished across the city.
"I don't want doctors who will just write an open-ended marijuana prescription to a patient they just met," he said. "I am quite aware of the L.A. problem; it's clearly out of control."
Similarly in Colorado, which has had a medical marijuana law since 2000, towns have begun trying to close dispensaries. Until last year, there were only about a dozen dispensaries statewide. Since then, hundreds have opened, serving about 40,000 patients.
But the state didn't address dispensaries in the law, creating a lack of uniformity in how they operate, said Brian Vicente, co-chair of Colorado's Sensible Patient and Provider Coalition. The coalition includes medical marijuana advocacy groups, business owners, caregivers and patients who are seeking some new regulation of medical marijuana.