Don't Look To 'Twilight' Series For Strong Female Role Models

November 23, 2009|By Sarah Seltzer

NEW YORK - If you've been spending time in proximity to teenage girls recently, there's a strong chance you've heard about "New Moon" and Edward Cullen. Edward is the undead hero of the best-selling young adult fantasy/romance "Twilight" series. He's reached heartthrob status in a major way, and he's done it while refusing to devour, or sleep with, the story's heroine. And now "New Moon," the second book in the series, is coming to a movie theater near you.

The "Twilight" books, written by Stephenie Meyer, have been heralded as the next "Harry Potter." To bank on the comparisons, "Breaking Dawn," the concluding installation, hit bookstores last summer with "Potter"-esque midnight parties, secrecy and sales in the millions. (although they didn't touch the "Potter" series' numbers, mostly because the fan base is so exclusively female and postpubescent).

There's plenty to cheer about when it comes to young girls reading voraciously. "Twilight" is much in the tradition of teen literature such as the "Nancy Drew" mysteries and "Goosebumps." The books are also rife with allusions to Shakespeare, Austen, and the Bront?s.

But what makes the "Twilight" saga particularly fascinating and disturbing are the sexual currents that run through its pages. Like American culture itself, "Twilight" is both lascivious and chaste. Ms. Meyer, a practicing Mormon, has said she draws a line at premarital sex for her characters. But, as New York Times columnist Gail Collins noted last year, boyfriend Edward holds the line, not heroine and narrator Bella. Bella, after all, is so hot for Edward she tells him she's going to "spontaneously combust."

Meanwhile, he is equally besotted with her, so much so that he trains himself to ignore his thirst for her blood, which has an aroma that could make even a good vampire (Edward and his coven have forsworn munching on humankind) go bad.

Yet Edward still won't go all the way because he doesn't want to get carried away and hurt Bella with his superhuman strength. Her physical safety becomes a symbolic substitute for her virginity, and Edward guards it with overprotective zeal.

Now that's a real fantasy: a world in which young women are free to describe their desires openly and launch themselves at men without shame, while said boyfriends are the sexual gatekeepers. The sexual flowchart in "Twilight" is the inversion of abstinence-only/purity ball culture.

But purity is still the goal. Men, or vampires, are still dangerous and threatening, while females are still breakable and fragile. Intercourse still has the potential of resulting in "death," just as it once relegated women to a social death. The only difference is, the controls are handed over from the teenage girl to the guy.

Ms. Meyer has tapped into a serious artery of the teen female psyche. Adding to the dynamic is the fact that Bella is a cipher whose only strong impulses are self-sacrifice and vampire lust.

Bella's other trait - overwhelming clumsiness - approximates adolescent bodily discomfort, the kind that comes from young women's realization that in a patriarchal society their bodies are now perceived as trouble incarnate. Rescuing Bella from her physical mishaps are Edward and her other suitor, Jacob, a werewolf. The two of them happily tote her around so much, it's a wonder Bella's legs don't atrophy.

It would be a far braver move for Ms. Meyer to show Bella's relationship helping her grow comfortable in her body. But instead she goes for the cheaper, more seductive, thrill of suggesting that ungainly, weak female bodies are the most attractive to men.

The lure of the books is so strong, even for feminist media critics, that it's disturbing to resurface and ponder how retrograde Ms. Meyer's world is. Bella's willingness to sacrifice her physical safety, her education, and her family and social ties for Edward - and the well-meaning but stringent control he exerts over her - are reminiscent, as some readers have said, of abusive relationships.

But teens are unlikely to change their views after reading the books: The hopeless romantics will remain so; the pragmatic readers will feel frustrated with Bella. Same goes for the book's take on virginity. It's doubtful Ms. Meyer foresaw how much graphic premarital sex in all kinds of gender and species permutations would appear in online fan fiction.

It appears that "Twilight" readers' moms have found a good opening to talk about sex with their kids. And even better, the books have got teens arguing about gender roles, when to have sex, what defines a heroine, and the meaning of true love.

But the lively online debate generated by the books implies that they may do more good than harm. It's the misogynistic climate in the books that harms their quality.

If Ms. Meyer had been able to put her "family values" aside to give Bella more spunk (and maybe a college education?) and generally lighten up on the patriarchal subtexts, the saga would improve aesthetically, and maybe, like the "Harry Potter" canon, reveal truths far beyond teenage wish fulfillment. Literary feminists can hope that J.K. Rowling gets inspired to write a strong, realistic heroine and show Ms. Meyer how it's done.

Until then, there's always Buffy.

Sarah Seltzer is a freelance writer. This piece was originally posted at RH Reality Check and was distributed by The Christian Science Monitor.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.