* The speed cameras were especially effective in reducing crashes that resulted in injuries and fatalities - cutting them from 206 to 126 for a reduction of 39 percent. That's 80 people spared death or injury in one county in one year under highly restricted rules. The report's authors suggested that the reason serious crashes declined at a greater rate than property-damage crashes is that reduced speeds were limiting the severity of collisions.
Meanwhile, the study undercut one of the most common objections to cameras - that they would increase the number of rear-end collisions because drivers would suddenly mash on their brakes as they came into speed camera range. In fact, the report found an 18 percent decline in rear-end crashes within a half-mile of camera sites.
One of the most common complaints about speed cameras is that drivers who receive tickets can't "confront their accuser." In fact, the report shows that few take advantage of their option to contest photo-generated tickets. Less then one-half of 1 percent of the 740,000 citations issued over a two-year period were contested. The conviction rate in District Court: 99.7 percent.
