The Gun Show Loophole Revisited

And From Our Blog...

Second Opinion

April 23, 2009

Roughly 10 years after Columbine and two years after the Virginia Tech massacre, the families of shooting victims were back on Capitol Hill on Tuesday pleading for Congress to close the gun show loophole. All they seek is for all gun purchasers to be required to pass background checks that help keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and the mentally ill.

Is that really so much to ask?

Too many states continue to allow individuals without a dealer's license to sell firearms at gun shows and thereby skirt the 16-year-old federal background check requirement. Authorities estimate that between 25 percent and 50 percent of vendors at gun shows are unlicensed.

Omar Samaha, whose sister was one of the 32 killed at Virginia Tech, took a network television crew to a gun show for a little experiment recently. He was able to purchase 10 guns. In an hour. No questions asked.

A gun show purchase isn't the most common way for a criminal to get a gun, as the NRA likes to point out. That's true. But it does happen (gun shows are the source for 30 percent of illegal gun trafficking, according to one federal study, and they're where the guns used at Columbine were acquired). There's simply no need for it.

Americans have plenty of opportunities to buy a gun. Surveys show most people - even a majority of gun owners - see nothing wrong with a background check prior to a gun purchase of any type.

Why not make it the law?

@baltimoresun.com Read and respond to a new blog by members of The Baltimore Sun's editorial board at /opinion

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.