Canada, It's Time To Put Down The Hakapik

April 15, 2009|By KATHLEEN PARKER

It isn't every day that one's very own hakapik arrives in the mail.

It is probably reasonable to assume that I'm the only person on my block to be the un-proud possessor of the aptly named bludgeoning and hacking instrument used to slaughter baby seals.

April 15 may be tax and tea party day in the U.S., but it's baby-seal death day in Canada. Although the season began March 23 (19,411 down), the largest phase was to begin Wednesday, during which sealers will destroy and skin another couple of hundred thousand seals, most between 25 days and three months old.

Like most, I've known about the baby seal hunts for decades and have averted my gaze. I've merely wished feverishly that someone would put a stop to it. I might have managed another year without weighing in on the world's largest maritime massacre if not for my hakapik, delivered compliments of PETA.

My hakapik has a 42-inch handle with a combo hammerhead/spike on the end. The hammer portion is used, theoretically, to crush the seal's skull, while the spike is used to haul the carcass away. (Older seals are usually shot with rifles.)

Those who favor hakapiks argue that they are efficient and humane. Efficient because they allow for a "clean kill," meaning the pelt isn't damaged. "Humane" because a properly delivered blow to the head causes instant, painless death.

Opponents of this gruesome drill claim it isn't possible to properly administer a blow to the head when one is standing on a slippery ice floe swinging a heavy club at a small, moving animal. Consequently, at least some animals are not killed humanely - or even killed at all before being skinned and gutted. A 2007 European Food Safety Authority report concluded that effective killing doesn't always occur, causing animals pain and distress.

Researchers at the University of Bristol said that a maximum of 15 percent of seals observed on videos were killed in a manner that conformed to the Marine Mammal Regulations, and that violations were probably worse because they didn't have access to continuous sequences for all seals.

Hunters argue that the baby seal "harvest" is simply more visible than, say, the factories where baby calves and lambs are destroyed for scaloppine and party chops. But does one cruelty justify another?

Increasingly, the answer is "no," as other countries follow the lead of Americans, who banned seal products in 1972.

As of March 18, Russia has banned its seal hunt after the bear-hunting Vladimir V. Putin called sealing a "bloody industry." And the European Parliament has adopted a declaration banning commercial seal products (but still allows for traditional hunting, e.g. Inuit).

In the meantime, market and other forces seem to be tilting favorably toward the baby seals. Pelt prices are down from $100 per animal in 2006 to just $15 this year, thus undermining government claims of the seals' economic importance.

Pressures, meanwhile, are mounting across the border where U.S. Sens. Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan, and Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, recently introduced a resolution urging the Canadian government to end the commercial seal hunt.

Come on, Canada. See things Mr. Putin's way and I'll donate my hakapik to the museum of your choice.

Kathleen Parker's syndicated column appears regularly in The Baltimore Sun. Her e-mail is kparker@kparker.com.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.