Advertisement
You are here: Sun HomeCollectionsHelmet

Some got the point, but they still took offense

GETTING THERE

March 23, 2009|By MICHAEL DRESSER , gettingthere@baltsun.com

Older readers may remember a much-missed magazine called the National Lampoon, which in its heyday put on its cover a picture of a cute puppy with a gun to its head and the caption: "If you don't buy this magazine, we'll kill this dog."

Some people thought the cover was hilarious. Some thought it was tasteless. Others thought the editors really were going to murder the poor animal.

So it goes, when in the course of lampooning attitudes toward bicyclists, one describes them as "obnoxious." It didn't matter that the point of the column was to support proposed legislation in the Maryland General Assembly to protect riders by requiring drivers to allow a 3-foot buffer when passing bicyclists. Some folks were offended, which I regret.

Advertisement

Carl Lupica of Fallston was among the readers who thought I shot the pooch.

Way to go in reinforcing every negative stereotype in a few sentences, and giving every sociopath in a car additional reasons to harass cyclists. Every bike on the road represents one less person in a car, and that is not a bad thing.

Despite the true intent of your column, your pandering to the anti-cycling, pro-automobile crowd does no one a great service.

I am a cyclist and have had full soda cans thrown at me. I've been run off the road by yokels in pickup trucks. I've been called all manner of names, cut off in traffic and intentionally brushed back by dozens and dozens of idiots in cars.

For the record: Bicyclists are no more irksome than motorists, pedestrians, bus riders and the rest of our obnoxious species. Bike riders have every right to use the roads. Even when they have the gall to slow me down. Nothing written here should be construed as permission or encouragement to harass, annoy or maim bicyclists.

But, Carl, we have to do something about this perpetuation of negative stereotypes about drivers of pickup trucks. Those "yokels" may hold doctoral degrees.

Among other things, Charles M. Fitzpatrick of Baltimore objected to my reference to "dweeby" bicycle helmets.

That is ridiculous. The reason I wear a helmet and high visibility vest looking "dweeby" is to reduce the chance of winding up with brain damage, using a wheelchair or walking with a cane because some driver of a motor vehicle ran a red light or stop sign, drove drunk or passed me too closely.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|