Overall state education aid to localities will fall by $69 million

a few counties will gain money

January 23, 2009|By Liz Bowie and Laura Smitherman | Liz Bowie and Laura Smitherman,bowie@baltsun.com and laura.smitherman@baltsun.com

State funding for local schools would plunge by $69 million next year under Gov. Martin O'Malley's plan to eliminate a nearly $2 billion shortfall in Maryland's budget, a change that would hit poorest districts hardest.

Under the 2010 budget proposal introduced this week, Baltimore would receive $23 million less than in the current school year and Prince George's would be cut by $35 million. Baltimore County would lose $8 million. The belt-tightening comes after years of robust growth in education spending under the landmark 2002 education funding plan known as the Thornton formula.

"The impact is devastating," said Baltimore schools chief Andres Alonso, calling the cuts "the effective rollback of Thornton."

In unveiling the budget Wednesday, the O'Malley administration said it had protected preK-to-12th-grade education funding from the deepest cuts, and in fact, dollars for schools would increase over last year by $68 million overall.

That figure is the result of an extra $135 million for the state's retirement system for teachers and school administrators. The governor has, in fact, proposed reducing the dollars that flow into local school system operating budgets.

For the past six years, state aid to education has been increasing at a rapid pace. Schools have gotten about $2 billion more than in the 2001-2002 school year, when the legislature voted to redo the school funding formula. Thornton has resulted in more money for those jurisdictions with high numbers of special education and poor students as well as those learning English.

Earlier this month, a consultant's report said the increase in funding was responsible for sharp gains in test scores, and a national education magazine ranked Maryland schools No. 1 in the nation.

The news from Annapolis brought harsh words from Alonso, who said the city expected an increase based on rising enrollment. This school year, the city system reversed 40 years of enrollment declines and gained 1,000 new students.

"Adequacy is no longer a part of the conversation," Alonso said. "How do we have the first enrollment increase in four decades and lose over $20 million in actual revenues? It's economizing on the backs of the neediest students in the state."

Administration officials contend that O'Malley has made historic investments in education and has set aside $1 billion for school construction, including $260 million proposed for this year. They also note that local governments balked at picking up teacher pension costs, an option the governor abandoned when crafting his budget.

"The governor's unprecedented investment in K-12 education is a commitment that is upheld in this budget," spokesman Shaun Adamec said. "The overall investment went from $5.3 billion last year to $5.4 billion this year [fiscal 2010]. There has been a $932 million increase over three years."

O'Malley fully funds the Thornton education funding plan - formally known as the "Bridge to Excellence Act" - in his budget, according to aides. Some jurisdictions received decreases when the numbers were run in the formula, which takes into account a variety of factors including enrollment, the contribution of local governments and the jursidictions' wealth.

The governor did change other formulas, such as a cost-sharing arrangement for special-needs students, including those who are sent away to private schools when the public system can't adequately serve their needs. In Baltimore, that could account for $10 million of the decline, according to state officials.

"The proposed cuts will be devastating to school systems. They are taking boards off the Bridge to Excellence, and children will fall through the cracks," said Bebe Verdery, education director for the Maryland branch of the American Civil Liberties Union. "There is no doubt this will directly hit the classroom."

The administration did not give school systems the 1 percent increase that they had been promised, and it didn't include a planned increase in the optional geographic cost-of-education index, which is designed to provide additional money to school systems where the cost of living is highest.

Not all the state's jurisdictions were critical of the cuts. Bob Mosier, an Anne Arundel County school system spokesman, said districts had feared the state might ask them to take over the responsibility for funding teacher pensions.

"I think, overall, we're pleased he didn't choose to shift the teacher pensions, which would have been an incredibly harsh blow to us and to all school systems," Mosier said.

Anne Arundel would lose about $5 million, or 1.8 percent of its state aid.

"Obviously, we know and have known that there are going to be cuts of some kind. I don't think the fact that the governor had to make some very difficult decisions is a surprise to anybody," Mosier said. "It certainly could have been worse. Not that it won't hurt, but it could have been worse."

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.