Report fuels death debate

Md. foes of capital punishment gear for new fight in Assembly

December 13, 2008|By Julie Bykowicz | Julie Bykowicz,julie.bykowicz@baltsun.com

With a high-powered commission recommending abolition of the death penalty in Maryland, opponents of capital punishment gained fresh momentum yesterday as they ready a repeal effort for the General Assembly session beginning next month.

A debate over the hot-button social issue could quickly become one of the most heated fights in Annapolis, with Gov. Martin O'Malley pledging that ending the death penalty is among his top priorities.

The capital punishment panel, headed by former U.S. Attorney General Benjamin R. Civiletti, cited the possibility of executing an innocent person, huge financial costs, and racial and regional biases as compelling reasons to eliminate the punishment.

"There are so many faults, so many flaws within the system that we could not imagine ... ways in which to cure it," Civiletti said yesterday.

The issue of capital punishment has long divided the legislature, and repeal efforts have failed the past two years. A bill died last year on a tie vote in a Senate committee.

But Del. Samuel I. Rosenberg, a Baltimore Democrat and commission member, said he believes both the House and Senate could reach a consensus next year.

"I believe the overwhelming weight of the evidence in the study will have bearing on my colleagues," Rosenberg said. "And Chairman Civiletti will be an extraordinary advocate for the failures of the death penalty, the impossibility of correcting it and therefore the necessity of repealing it."

O'Malley, a longtime death penalty opponent, selected most of the commission's 23 members - a mix of legislators, lawyers, civilians and clergy. They listened to 35 hours of testimony over five months before releasing their findings to the Assembly.

The study examined disparities in how the death penalty is applied, the impact of DNA evidence and several other issues, reaching clear majorities on each that the death penalty is problematic.

Thirteen commission members voted for repeal. Nine voted against it, and Gary D. Maynard, secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, abstained from voting. Two of the five legislators on the panel opposed abolition.

The repeal recommendation comes as little surprise, since the commission voted on its main finding a month ago.

But the conclusions, detailed in 132 pages, outline specific concerns developed after listening to the testimony of 84 witnesses. Twenty of 23 panel members agreed that racial disparities and differences in how the death penalty is sought from one jurisdiction to the next created significant problems.

"The present administration of capital punishment shows substantial disparities in its application based on race and jurisdiction," the report said. "These disparities are so great among and between comparable cases that the death penalty process is best described as arbitrary and capricious."

Rosenberg said he and Sen. Lisa A. Gladden, a Baltimore Democrat, would likely introduce repeal legislation that reflected the commission's findings.

Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott D. Shellenberger wrote a 22-page dissent, signed by seven other members. Shanetta J. Paskel, representing the Maryland Attorney General's Office, also dissented but did not sign Shellenberger's opinion.

Prosecutors must be able to "reflect the will of the people," Shellenberger said yesterday, arguing that the state should retain the death penalty as a tool to wield against "the worst of the worst."

He said regional disparities - the probability of receiving a death sentence in Baltimore County is nearly 23 times higher than in Baltimore City, according to a 2003 study - can be explained by "local rule."

"[D]ifferent sentences in different counties for the same kind of crime are legal and constitutional," Shellenberger wrote in the dissent. "Disparities in sentencing exist in each county across the entire spectrum of crimes committed in Maryland."

Maynard, who abstained from all votes, said he saw his role as a provider of information about confinement costs and conditions. "I have a personal opinion, but my professional opinion has always been to carry out every law," said Maynard, who has been a corrections official in three states for 25 years.

Since Maryland reinstated capital punishment in 1978, five men have been put to death, most recently Wesley Eugene Baker on Dec. 5, 2005. Five others are on death row now, including three men convicted in 1984.

State executions have been under an effective moratorium since December 2006, when Maryland's highest court ruled that lethal injection regulations had not been properly adopted. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled this year that execution by lethal injection is constitutional, a decision that required Maryland to restart its rule-making process. Maynard is reviewing a draft that he plans to give to a legislative review panel by the end of the year, a prison spokesman said.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.