Getting on board

Dixon, Smith to back east-west light rail with mix of surface, underground track

December 10, 2008|By Michael Dresser | Michael Dresser,

Mayor Sheila Dixon and Baltimore County Executive James T. Smith Jr. plan to announce tomorrow that they support construction of an east-west light rail line that involves a mix of surface and underground tracks - an alternative that has won the support of Baltimore business leaders.

The heads of the two metropolitan governments will urge the Maryland Transit Administration to choose what is known as Alternative 4C as its preferred design for the proposed Red Line from Woodlawn to Bayview. The $1.6 billion proposal would run light rail in tunnels under downtown, Fells Point and Cooks Lane in West Baltimore, but would otherwise operate on the surface.

Dixon said yesterday that the Red Line, which could open as early as 2012 if the project can avoid snags, is crucial to the region's economic future. "We have no comprehensive transportation system in this city," she said "We have to get away from relying on cars."

Smith said the Red Line would provide opportunities for redevelopment in the county, especially around Security Square Mall and the Medicare-Medicaid complex in Woodlawn.

"We can't move forward as an innovative and forward-thinking community without a world-class public transit system, and this is an opportunity and it's time to make it a reality," Smith said.

Civic leaders have been hinting for months that they favor the plan and that they saw problems with other light rail and rapid bus alternatives. The Greater Baltimore Committee took the lead in advocating the limited-tunnel light rail plan when it endorsed Alternative 4C in September.

The announcement puts the two jurisdictions most affected by the choice on record in support of a "locally preferred alternative" when the MTA takes its decision to the federal government in an application for funds.

Henry M. Kay, the MTA's deputy administrator for planning and engineering, said it would be unusual for a public transit agency to make a selection that flies in the face of the will of local political leaders. "Elected officials - that's their role is to capture and articulate the desires of their constituents," he said.

Dixon's support for 4C could be crucial for another reason. The proposal has been greeted with suspicion in West Baltimore, where some residents have perceived the plan, which involves running the tracks on the surface along Edmondson Avenue, as racially discriminatory. As an African-American and a resident of the Edmondson Avenue (U.S. 40) corridor, Dixon has been working with community leaders in West Baltimore to allay concerns.

The mayor said the surface Red Line plan is part of a larger community development effort that would reroute much of the commuter traffic that now uses U.S. 40. By narrowing the avenue and slowing traffic, city officials hope to move many of the commuters onto the Red Line as transit riders or onto the Beltway and Interstate 395 as drivers.

"What we want to do is bring back Edmondson Avenue into a neighborhood that's greener," said Dixon, who lives in Hunting Ridge. "My house is three doors off Edmondson. I believe it's going to enhance my community."

Many residents of West Baltimore, as well as some in East Baltimore, favor an alternative that would have put the light rail line underground for much of its 14.6-mile length, including stretches along Boston Street and Edmondson Avenue.

But MTA officials said months ago that studies showed that those alternatives, because of their extensive tunneling, would almost certainly be too costly to win approval under federal cost-benefit standards.

Angela Bethea-Spearman, president of the Uplands Community Association, testified in favor of the maximum-tunnel option during public hearings last month. But she said she's been warming up to the 4C plan "with modifications" since the adoption of a Red Line "community compact" specifying how the city and the MTA would work with residents.

"There must be some community benefits and there must be some assurances, and they have to be documented," said Bethea-Spearman, who also heads the Southwest Development Committee.

Bus rapid transit, dedicated bus lanes with various levels of tunneling, is an alternative that is on the table, but recent public hearings revealed little support for it. Aides said Smith and Dixon prefer light rail because it offers a greater sense of permanence that would better encourage transit-oriented development along the route.

"There's enough challenge in getting people to turn to mass transit, and buses are not exactly the most attractive modes of transportation in the minds of many people," Smith said.

Some transit advocates, dissatisfied with the relatively slow speeds of light rail, continue to hold out hope for a heavy-rail alternative similar to the Metro. They contend that the MTA has rejected that alternative without giving it sufficient consideration.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.