The election is less than a week away. Health care remains a key issue for most Americans, with the declining economy serving to underscore how important it is that the next president get health care right. Considerable ink and blog space have been devoted to explicating the details and expected outcomes of Sen. Barack Obama's and Sen. John McCain's health care plans. Armed with analyses from health economists, both campaigns are peppering last-minute speeches and ads with specific figures about how much money their health care plans would save you and how much their plans would cost.
Yet we would all be wise to take these figures with a large grain of salt. Health economists are the first to say that the assumptions they are using to generate the numbers are open to serious question.
Despite such uncertainties, Americans need to know whom to trust to meet the challenge of health care reform. There are real differences between the candidates, but in this case, it is far safer for voters to make decisions based on the candidates' values rather than the candidates' facts. Mr. McCain's and Mr. Obama's health plans are based on very different moral visions of what makes a health care system fair, and this difference offers voters a real basis for choice.
