Advertisement

Currie probe looks at possible influence deals

Records detail his calls to chain

July 24, 2008|By Gadi Dechter and Laura Smitherman , Sun Reporters

The federal investigation into state Sen. Ulysses Currie's work for Shoppers Food Warehouse is centered on whether the grocery chain paid the lawmaker to use the prestige of his office to secure favorable legislation and actions by state agencies, according to newly released documents that detail electronic phone records and surveillance of the prominent lawmaker's home.

Agents with the FBI's public corruption squad have turned up paychecks from Shoppers to Currie and hundreds of phone calls the Prince George's County Democrat made to company officials, often when the company was seeking to influence public officials on legislation and business transactions.

At least two current and former Shoppers employees have been cooperating with the continuing investigation, their attorneys told The Sun.

Advertisement

Currie never disclosed his employment by Shoppers on General Assembly ethics forms, and state and city officials whom he lobbied on the grocery chain's behalf have said they weren't aware of the connection. Currie has declined to discuss the case, and his attorney, Dale Kelberman, did not return a call yesterday.

Shoppers' parent company, Minnesota-based Supervalu Inc., has also declined to comment on the case, other than to acknowledge that Currie was an "outside consultant" to the supermarket chain. According to the search warrant affidavit, Shoppers began paying Currie as a consultant in early 2003, the year he became chairman of the Senate's powerful Budget and Taxation Committee.

At Kelberman's request, Federal Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm redacted portions of the affidavit describing bank and tax records that reveal the amount of money Currie received from Shoppers over the years.

The new documents confirm that the FBI investigation is focused on Currie's employment with Shoppers and that federal prosecutors are investigating possible mail or wire fraud. Under federal criminal law, prosecutors have wide latitude to bring charges against state officials if the alleged fraud involved the use of U.S. mail, phones, radio or TV.

Any "scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false and fraudulent purposes" is punishable by up to 20 years in prison, according to federal law. The federal statute defines "scheme or artifice" as an attempt "to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services." That is how federal prosecutors can go after conflicts of interest by state officials, according to former federal prosecutors and white-collar defense attorneys.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|