The bellicose charges, military exercises, diplomatic challenges and missile test firings playing out between Iran, the U.S. and Israel this week reflect the continuing unease over Tehran's nuclear ambition and a possible military response to it. The launching of nine missiles, including one that could reach Tel Aviv, was Iran's latest move in a political game of one-upmanship. It comes in the wake of U.S.-British military exercises in the Persian Gulf and last month's Israeli air maneuvers that some suspect were a practice run for a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. The presidential candidates have responded with predictable tough talk, but the focus here should be on reinforcing a commitment to vigorous, substantive diplomacy and Iran's need to be transparent about its nuclear intentions.
A House resolution seen as calling for a naval blockade of Iran is needlessly provocative. It undercuts Bush administration efforts, albeit belated, to strengthen the sticks (sanctions) and enhance the carrots (a European-backed economic aid package) to persuade Iran to drop its uranium enrichment program, which Iran insists is peaceful.
