Letters To The Editor


May 02, 2008

'Peace heroes' may lead us astray

Charles Derber and Yale Magrass write in their column "Rethinking 'war hero'" (Commentary, April 21) that "The peace hero - even more than the war hero - should be the ultimate moral force in the world we now inhabit."

I wonder what "ultimate moral force" peace heroes such as folk singer Pete Seeger and entertainer Paul Robeson showed by supporting the 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact, which consigned Poland's Jews to the Final Solution and a large portion of Poland's officer corps and technical elite to the Katyn Forest Massacre at the hands of the Soviets?

Their moral actions involved slandering President Franklin Roosevelt as a warmonger for having the temerity to support Great Britain against Germany and its short-term ally, the Soviet Union.

Their idea of "peace" in that case ended up carrying water for Joseph Stalin, even if it meant supporting Adolf Hitler. What ultimate moral force did Vietnam-era peace activists such as Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda display?

Their efforts helped bring about the collapse of the government of South Vietnam, which led to Orwellian re-education camps in postwar Vietnam, along with the Vietnamese Boat people and the genocide by the Khmer Rouge.

Mr. Derber and Mr. Magrass are well within their right to question the morality of going to war. This is, indeed, a legitimate concern for our republic.

However, investing ultimate moral authority in peace activists, while being blind to the dangerous consequences of their advocacy of a false peace, breeds moral relativism and, worse, a lack of resolve to understand that there are times when we must stand and fight.

Mark Newgent, Baltimore

Take a hard look at Syria charges

Accusations about a Syrian nuclear program appear to bear out the concerns expressed by hard-liners in the Bush administration ("White House claims N. Korea-Syria link," April 25).

The construction of a facility close to the Iraqi border under mysterious circumstances and its destruction last September is a story that would make a novelist envious.

But before this incident becomes the raison d'etre for another pre-emptive war, Congress should take a hard look.

If the plant was started in 2001, why did it take so long for the White House to denounce its purpose? And given the intense surveillance of Syria by American and Israeli intelligence, how did Damascus expect to keep it a secret?

With unrelenting American pressure and the threat of regime change, would a cautious Syrian President Bashar Assad invite military action by going nuclear?

Nuclear nonproliferation is a worthy goal. Before we take the high moral ground, however, it would enhance our international support and standing if we did something about the only Mideast country that has a nuclear arsenal and delivery system - Israel.

Without universal compliance, America's call for a nuclear-free Near East smacks of hypocrisy.

Joseph Elias, Wilkes-Barre, Pa.

Article ignored struggles of Israel

I read with great dismay The Sun's Sunday article on the plight of the Palestinians and their dream of their own state ("The Palestinians' melancholy anniversary," April 27).

While I empathize with the account of their troubles, I strongly disapprove of this article because it said not a word about the plight of Israel, which has been fighting for its existence since it became a state in 1948.

A strip of barren desert has been transformed into a beautiful land in an effort to fulfill the dreams not only of Holocaust survivors but individuals of many religions.

Since 1948 Israel has fought many wars, and it probably faces more to come. And, as for the plight of the Palestinians awaiting a state of their own, there are always two sides to every story.

Freda Garelick, Baltimore

'Alcopops' bill deserves a veto

The Maryland chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics supports The Sun's powerful editorial on the state's "alcopops" legislation ("Not near beer," April 29).

According to the Youth Risk Behavior Study in Maryland, more than 80 percent of high school seniors have used alcohol, and more than 20 percent drink more than twice a month.

Alcohol has been shown to have permanent effects on developing brains and to lead to other risky behaviors.

A veto of this legislation would encourage more thoughtful consideration about how alcohol is marketed to kids.

We support The Sun 's view that Gov. Martin O'Malley should take a stand and not allow the alcopops bill to pass.

Dr. Dan Levy, Baltimore

The writer is president of the Maryland chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Bisphenol shown to be quite safe

The Sun's article "Study raises concerns on chemical, cancer" (April 16) and several reports released in April may cause confusion and unnecessary alarm about Bisphenol-A (BPA).

It's important for Sun readers to know that the National Toxicology Program report indicated that the effects of BPA fell into the government's lowest possible risk ranking.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.