Last month, Colgate-Palmolive began marketing several phosphate-free dishwashing detergents under the name eco+. It's not hard to understand the new product's appeal. Many states, including Maryland, have required that dishwashing detergent be rid of the phosphates that are threatening to destroy aquatic life.
So why did the General Assembly last month approve legislation postponing Maryland's phosphate ban for six months from January to July 2010? Environmental groups say it was to benefit one company, Proctor & Gamble, which hasn't yet released its own version of a phosphate-free product. That's a triumph for the Cincinnati-based corporation, which can point to a handful of other states that are waiting the full two years to impose a ban. But it's a tragedy for the Chesapeake Bay and an insult to those making real sacrifices to protect the nation's largest estuary.
Large corporations have argued against phosphate bans before. Two decades ago, some warned that removing phosphates from laundry detergent would leave us with permanent ring-around-the-collar. Instead, reformulated laundry soap proved just as effective.
