White men's motives not so transparent

April 28, 2008|By Kathleen Parker

In the days leading up to Pennsylvania's primary, white males - those knuckle-dragging, chaw-chompin', beer-swillin' bitter troglodytes - were suddenly the debutante's delight. How were the Democrats to woo these crucial swing voters, known in other circles as the Republican Party base?

Political commentators' brains grew new crevices as they pondered the imponderable: Would white males go for the woman or the black man? Or as Nora Ephron more pointedly posed the question: Whom do white men hate more, women or blacks?

By Ms. Ephron's calculus, if a white male votes for a black man, it couldn't possibly be because he finds the man a more suitable candidate. He simply hates women more.

And if he votes for the woman, he probably has his nutty uncle's white-sheet ensemble stashed upstairs in an attic trunk just in case cross burning enjoys a revival. He couldn't possibly deem any woman superior to any man. He simply hates blacks more.

Are all white males really so monolithically repugnant and predictable?

Race and gender do matter, of course. They enter into the human equations to varying degrees, subconsciously if not consciously, in any transaction. We have certain expectations and are all guilty of stereotyping, much as we insist otherwise.

To what extent race and gender matter in elections, we're only now beginning to find out. A year ago, a Washington Post-ABC News poll found that voters were less concerned about race and gender than they were about age. While 58 percent said they'd be less likely to vote for a candidate older than 72, only 13 percent said they'd be less likely to support a woman, and just 6 percent felt less inclined to vote for a black candidate.

In Pennsylvania last week, exit polls found 19 percent of Democrats saying that the race of a candidate played a role in their vote. But what does that mean? That it matters a little or a lot - or that race is a deal-breaker?

Mrs. Clinton beat Mr. Obama by a 10-point margin in part because of WECM - white ethnic Catholic men.

Are ethnic Catholics necessarily racist? Or were they responding to something else when they voted against Mr. Obama? Perhaps his more liberal voting record? Or, just possibly, recent comments that were perceived as insulting and out of touch?

In fact, the groups that favored Mrs. Clinton over Mr. Obama included people 45 and over, working-class and union folks, as well as voters in the suburbs, small towns and in rural areas - those embittered Americans Mr. Obama recently described as clinging to their guns and religion out of frustration. Also among those Mr. Obama lost to Mrs. Clinton were weekly churchgoers and, yes, gun owners - by 63 percent to 37 percent.

So, yes, some percentage of Americans (or Turks or Greeks or Swedes) will always take race and gender into consideration at the polls. But Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama may not provide a clear picture as to how those issues play out in politics. Each brings too many confounding factors that distort the picture.

Mrs. Clinton isn't just any woman, needless to say. People like and dislike her often for the same reason - because she's the wife of Bill.

And Mr. Obama isn't just any black man. Those who like or dislike him don't necessarily base those opinions on his skin color or ethnic heritage.

Mrs. Clinton may not be Everywoman, no matter how unflinchingly she downs a tumbler of Crown Royal. But she is a more familiar entity than Mr. Obama, who, having grown up in Hawaii and Indonesia, doesn't share the life experiences of the groups that voted against him Tuesday.

Do they "hate" blacks, as the Ephron school insists? Or do they prefer a familiar individual who sees the world essentially as they do? Are white males misogynistic and racist? Or are they weary of being the only group in America that is fair game for contempt, insult and blame?

Bottom line: It's hard to woo people you don't really love.

Kathleen Parker's syndicated column appears regularly in The Sun. Her e-mail is kparker@kparker.com.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.