Wachovia's chilly write-down

A bad investment sends a shiver through money-market industry

October 30, 2007|By The Boston Globe

How safe is your money-market fund?

For investors who do not have the stomach for the ups and downs of the stock market, money-market funds have boomed in recent years as a haven for consumers to park their money. Investments can earn almost 5 percent annually in some of the biggest funds, supposedly without the risks associated with stock markets.

But since summer, problems have cropped up in several large money-market funds, showing that to achieve higher returns and attract more customers, some money-market managers may have been investing in riskier holdings.

Earlier this month, Wachovia Corp. disclosed a $40 million loss tied to money-market funds at its Evergreen Investments unit. Evergreen's largest money-market fund holds a stake in at least one of what are known as "structured investment vehicles," or SIVs, complex financial instruments that have become difficult to trade as credit problems have spread throughout the economy since the summer. Fidelity Investments also has significant holdings in SIVs, corporate filings show.

The institutions say their funds are in good shape overall. But money-market managers might be in for a difficult time, said Henry Shilling, leader of a money-market team at Moody's Investors Service, a debt rating agency in New York.

Money-market funds "are very safe, but clearly they're experiencing unprecedented volatility," Shilling said. Moody's knows of 145 serious cases of money-market fund problems since 1972, including the recent write-down at Evergreen, Shilling said, adding, "I suspect there will be others in the future."

The problems have not dampened investors' enthusiasm for money-market funds overall, said Peter G. Crane, whose Web site in Westborough, Mass. - cranedata.us - tracks the industry. He says investors have put more money into these funds than they have withdrawn nearly every week since August. Total holdings in U.S. money-market funds are approaching the $3 trillion mark.

"Call them lazy, or call them genius, but U.S. investors haven't blinked," he said.

Unlike mutual funds that invest in stocks for the long term, money-market funds invest in U.S. Treasury bills and other short-term securities that allow them to pay slightly more interest than products such as certificates of deposit.

Unlike bank accounts, money-market funds aren't insured but are perceived as safe because most invest in government securities, or government-backed mortgages. To increase their returns, many also invest a portion of their funds in "commercial paper" such as mortgages packaged into SIVs or corporate debt backed by assets such as real estate. Fund companies earn lucrative fees managing money-market funds.

The price of a share in a money-market fund is fixed at $1. If the value of the holdings in the fund falls much below $1 a share - a disaster known as "breaking the buck" - the fund company must take steps that can include eating the losses or dissolving the fund.

Overvalued holdings in money-market funds are more likely to be a serious problem for fund companies than for investors.

At Fidelity, for example, the money-market funds hold debt issued by various SIVs, including the largest, Sigma Finance Corp., operated by a London firm called Gordian Knot Ltd. Other Fidelity holdings include two run by Citigroup Inc., Beta Finance Corp. and Centauri Corp. "Fidelity seems to be one of the biggest culprits as far as chasing yield," said Joseph R. Mason, a Drexel University finance professor.

Fidelity spokesman Vincent Loporchio responded by saying: "Our first priority is to ensure that credit quality of the holdings in the funds is of the highest order" and noted the management meets Securities and Exchange Commission requirements. As of Sept. 30, he said, debt securities were just 2.3 percent of money-market assets.

"Fidelity has a rigorous research process to approve SIV debt securities for purchase in the money-market funds," he said. "We have been very selective in this approval process and have an in-depth understanding of each SIV investment manager, the quality of their asset portfolio, liability management, and overall operations."

An Evergreen spokeswoman declined to discuss the fund's SIV holdings in detail or describe the reasons for the $40 million write-off. Evergreen and Wachovia have said previously that they are "committed to preservation of capital in the money-market funds" - in this case meaning the parent would make good on losses in the funds.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.