Long-short funds don't live up to promise


October 14, 2007|By Gail MarksJarvis | Gail MarksJarvis,Tribune Media Services

Maybe plain-vanilla stock and bond mutual funds will do the job after all.

Long-short funds - the newfangled mutual funds designed to give common investors a hedge fund experience and protection during downturns - recently went through one of their first major tests. And they flopped.

In July and August, with investors concerned about subprime loans and a credit squeeze, the benchmark Standard & Poor's 500 stock index went down 9.4 percent. Long-short mutual funds - which are designed to hedge risk by betting on some stocks to rise and others to fall - went down 8.4 percent, according to Lipper Inc., a mutual fund tracking firm.

You would have thought long-short funds would come to the rescue of investors. That's why investors buy them.

But the funds dropped, along with their peers in the hedge fund arena, where only the rich and institutions such as pension plans are allowed admission.

"We've seen a lot of investor interest in these funds, but they are by no means a magic formula," said Morningstar analyst Marta Norton.

Hedge funds and mutual funds that act like hedge funds were introduced in large numbers during the last few years, a reaction to the 49 percent downturn in the S&P 500 index from 2000 to 2002. Investors wanted protection from such severe conditions. They also were worried about making better returns when market forecasters were predicting that stocks would climb 7 percent or 8 percent a year for the foreseeable future.

The long-short fund was supposed be an alternative that investors could drop into a typical portfolio of stock funds and bonds. Instead of simply buying stocks and holding onto them as they drop, long-short funds buy two varieties of stock, those the fund manager thinks will climb and those the fund manager thinks are positioned to drop.

When the manager thinks he has spotted a winner, he goes "long," that is buys a stock with the intention of making money as the price goes up. When the manager thinks a stock will be a loser, he "shorts" it, borrowing shares then selling them. Eventually, he will have to buy the shares to replace those he borrowed. But if he is right and the stock price falls, he will be able to buy shares at a lower price and make money. The beauty of the strategy - if it works - is that the fund can make money even when the stock market is in a downturn.

But finding the right stocks to short, and the right timing, isn't easy. The funds demonstrated that when they fell from July 19 to Aug. 15, during the broader market's downturn.

Any particular period can be an anomaly, but analysts and financial planners have their doubts now.

"I'm unconvinced that most investors need a long-short fund, and I'm even less convinced that most of the new long-short funds are a good value proposition," Morningstar analyst Christine Benz said in a recent report.

The flows of money in and out of the funds suggest that investors are thinking the same way. In mid-July, when the market peaked before heading down, investors poured $527 million into long-short funds, but "when the funds did very badly, there was a huge burst of outflows," said Bob Adler of AMG Data Services.

Investors pulled $776 million out of the funds In August and $105 million in September, he said.

It was the first time since December 2005 that investors had withdrawn money from the funds. They have about $20.3 billion in assets, and the flows have stabilized this month, Adler said.


Gail MarksJarvis writes for Tribune Media Services.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.