Newspaper ads push questionable stocks

September 23, 2007|By New York Times News Service

Check your e-mail, and chances are it holds several get-rich-quick offers to buy a hot stock in a tiny, unknown company.

The promotion of penny stocks, for years a staple of Internet spam and "boiler rooms" running illegal pump-and-dump schemes, has recently burst forth in splashy full-page ads in major daily newspapers.

Penny stocks are volatile, risky, thinly traded securities issued by minuscule companies that are disproportionately known for having big losses, meager sales, cozy insider management and scant or unverifiable financial data.

Unscrupulous promoters typically work by "blast" faxing or flooding the Internet with new releases so that investors will read the dubious news and bid up the hyped shares. Then the promoters can cash in by selling the stock, typically in huge volume.

There is a certain formula to these advertisements: breathless claims for a miraculous-sounding product or trove of commodities, comparisons to well-respected brands, and an exhortation to the reader to get in on the ground floor by investing in the unknown company.

"How much would you pay to slow or stop the aging process?" asks one ad from the Aug. 24 issue of USA Today for a company called MitoPharm, which makes what it calls a "true anti-aging drink" called Restorade. "This industry is making smart investors overnight millionaires," the ad states.

Maria Terrell, a spokeswoman for the International Newspaper Marketing Association, said: "It's not a newspaper's responsibility to verify the facts of an ad being placed." But she added that the recent ads, for newspapers and investors alike, were "definitely something to pay attention to."

In April, a small unknown company called Nano Chemical Systems Holdings bought a full-page ad in the business section of The New York Times, replete with frothy lines like, "Don't miss this incredible investment opportunity!"

In the ad, Nano Chemical Systems Holdings of Seaford, Del., a former publisher of history textbooks, described its plans to become a leading biofuel maker and compared itself to Intel and Microsoft. "These two industry giants made early investors rich beyond their wildest dreams," reads the copy, adding that "in much the same way, Nano Chemical Systems Holdings is positioning itself as one of the companies that can help make the alternative energy revolution possible!"

Neither the ad nor Nano Chemical's Web site discloses that the company's main business is manufacturing industrial waxes and lubricants.

The ad made no mention of the fact that in January 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued subpoenas to Nano Chemical related to its issuance of news releases, among other things. The company has said it is cooperating with the SEC's investigation.

The fine print at the bottom of the Nano Chemical Systems Holdings ad did disclose that a company named GIA Consulting had been paid more than $232,000 by an unnamed third party to prepare and place the ad as well as "other informational advertisements." While the ad said GIA Consulting did not own any shares in Nano Chemical Systems Holdings, it gave no contact details for GIA Consulting or specific mention of the third party.

Alex H. Edwards III, the interim chief executive of Nano Chemical Systems Holdings, said he thought GIA Consulting was "a shareholder who placed the ad because they thought the company was undervalued." He said he did not know where GIA Consulting was based or that the ad was coming out. Attempts to locate GIA Consulting were unsuccessful.

Asked about the ad, Abbe R. Serphos, a spokeswoman for the Times, said: "It has been the long-standing policy of The New York Times to accept advertisements that promote stocks or securities as long as those securities are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the attorney general of New York State."

She added: "In a few rare instances companies with unregulated securities have managed to place ads in the paper. When we learned of them, we took steps to make sure their ads do not appear in the paper again."

Nano Chemical Systems had registered its securities offerings, according to filings; the stock trades on the Pink Sheets for about 5 cents a share.

By May, other tiny, unknown companies, among them USA Superior Energy (an oil company), Trend Exploration (mining) and BioStem Inc. (stem cell storage), were subjects of full-page ads, some in color, in USA Today, the nation's largest-circulation daily newspaper.

The ad for BioStem, for example, said the firm was "capitalizing on the new cord blood stem cell industry with its potentially life-saving medical applications."

Those are high ambitions for a company formerly known as National Parking Systems, and whose main business today is still running parking lots and "vehicle immobilization services" in Atlanta, where it is based. None of that information is disclosed in the ad.

Neither is BioStem's previous incarnations as the Web Views Corp. (an Internet company) and the Cascade Mountain Mining Corp.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.