Con men are back `washing checks'

Criminals are dusting off an old technique involving solvents

May 29, 2007|By David Colker | David Colker,Los Angeles Times

Talk about money laundering.

A check made out to person A is bathed in a chemical available at any hardware store. In just a few minutes it's blank again and made out to person B - who is a thief. This process, which has been around for decades, is known as "check washing" among con men, and in an era of high-tech crimes it seems almost quaint.

Except that it's back. Along with other check crimes.

"What we are hearing is that it's a backlash after so much effort made by banks to boost security on their Web sites," said Will Wade, technology editor for trade journal American Banker. "Some of the scammers are going old school with the easier stuff."

U.S. banks lost $711 million because of check fraud in 2005, the most recent year the Federal Reserve studied the matter. But that's only a drop in the bucket.

Losses to individuals and business owners probably push that figure far higher.

It's familiar territory for reformed fraudster Frank Abagnale Jr., whose scams - some involving misdeeds with checks - were so infamous that Steven Spielberg made a film about him, Catch Me If You Can. "These people today are doing the same thing I was doing 40 years ago," said Abagnale, a security consultant and author.

But not all the schemes are stuck in the past. A new fake-check fraud, which often makes use of digital printers and the Internet, has proved to be particularly potent.

The nonprofit National Consumers League, founded in 1899, last year received more complaints about fake checks than any other scam, except those involving online auctions and purchases.

Here's a guide to the workings of two of the more prominent check scams - one retro and the other recent - and what to do if you're a victim:

Check washing. This was one of the hallmarks of Abagnale's former career, and it's still very much alive. It involves "washing" off the payee and amount written on a check and then substituting fraudulent information.

In most cases, the scammer first obtains a legitimate check through a variety of means. It can be one that was placed in a home mailbox as outgoing mail or one used to innocently pay for services.

The scammer uses an over-the-counter solvent to get rid of the writing on it, leaving the printed information such as bank routing numbers and the name and address of the account holder.

`Secure' pen

One defense against this type of fraud is the use of a "secure" pen - such as the Uni-ball 207 - that dispenses ink impervious to many solvents. It's cheap protection. The pen costs about $2.

If the scam is successfully carried out and the amount on a washed check is deducted from an account, chances are good that the victim can get the money refunded.

"This would be considered an unauthorized check," said Gail Hillebrand, an attorney with Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports magazine. Unless the scammer is found and made to pay up, the bank would suffer the loss.

But there are loopholes, mostly having to do with time. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a financial institution can set a deadline for complaints about a check charge. Generally, the standard is 30 days after a monthly statement is received.

Bonus checks. In this relatively new scam, the victim is contacted to say that for some reason, a check is on the way.

"Often, it's that they have somehow won a sweepstakes," said Susan Grant, director of the National Consumers League's fraud center.

Contact can be made with potential victims by mail or phone. But e-mail has vastly increased the reach of these scammers.

The fraud can start with the check payment for an item bought online. Or it can be born of a virtual affair.

"It can be part of a `sweetheart swindle,' " Grant said, "with a check coming from a woman who has established a relationship with someone online."

Usually, the check comes from outside the country. The person who gets it is asked to cash it and send back part or all of the money. "They are told it's for taxes, bonding or custom fees," Grant said.

"In the case of the sweetheart deal, the person is asked to cash the check because it's difficult to do that in her country."

Often, it's a cashier's check. Banks are usually obligated to pay out the money the day after the check is deposited. But that doesn't mean the check has cleared.

A recent case

In a recent case, a California woman was told she won $95,000 in a sweepstakes, Grant said. The woman was sent a "deposit" check for $1,950 and instructed to cash it and wire the money back to pay taxes. Then the rest of the winnings would arrive.

She did as told. But no more money was forthcoming.

Worse, the "deposit" check bounced a few days later.

"That's when you hear from the bank," said Charles Bruce, executive director of the National Check Fruad Center. "They want their money back."

Unlike in the money washing scam, the victim is held at fault because it was he or she who passed the phony check.

David Colker writes for the Los Angeles Times.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.