Head Start test gets low grade

Required assessment criticized as inappropriate and inaccurate

April 29, 2007|By Kathryn Masterson | Kathryn Masterson,Chicago Tribune

WASHINGTON -- Head Start teacher Enrique Renteria sits on the floor, holding up a book and asking the dozen 3- and 4-year- olds sitting around him about the flowers in the picture: What color is this flower? How do you say it in Spanish? What shape is this petal?

The children shout out the answers, and Renteria praises them or prompts them to try again.

Then, less than 10 minutes after sitting down, the kids are up, off to another activity.

Loudell Robb, a program director in charge of Head Start for Washington's Rosemount Center, where Renteria teaches, says young children learn best that way: through play and with activities suited to their short attention spans and bursts of energy.

What preschoolers aren't suited for, in Robb's opinion, is a 20-minute standardized test that requires them to sit and focus on a series of questions about letters, numbers and vocabulary intended to assess their school readiness. It's a test called the National Reporting System that's required of all Head Start students ages 4 and 5 every spring and fall, a program that Congress is considering doing away with.

A Senate bill to reauthorize Head Start that suspends the test was passed unanimously by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee in February and is expected to go to a full Senate vote this spring. A similar bill passed the House Committee on Education and Labor, 42-1, last month and is expected to soon go to the full House for a vote. Meanwhile, toddlers will take the exam next month as Head Start teachers attempt to measure how much progress the youngsters have made since the beginning of the school year.

"I have found the test to be of no validity," Robb said. "It's such an intrusion into the lives of low-income children. ... It's unfair to children who do not have exposure to some of the vocabulary items they're testing for."

She points to words on the test such as decorating, nostril, horrified, nutritious and farm that children are asked to identify from four pictures. Nutritious is represented by a loaf of bread, a nostril is shown in a picture of a nose.

"Children don't use that word. They say nose," Robb said.

The National Reporting System has been in place since 2003. About 400,000 preschoolers enrolled in Head Start, a federal program started in 1965 to provide education, health and nutrition services to poor children and their families, take the test at the beginning and the end of the school year.

The test starts with a game of Simon Says, then progresses to asking the child to identify pictures of objects such as a frog or a bee. Children are tested on vocabulary by identifying a picture and are asked to identify letters. The math portion tests knowledge of numbers and ability to count, and has some elementary bar graphs.

Supporters of the test say it provides accountability, showing whether Head Start programs, which serve more than 900,000 children nationwide, are preparing those children for school.

"It gives us an opportunity to really assess how well our children are doing," said Channell Wilkins, the director of the federal office of Head Start, which is under the Administration for Children and Families. Wilkins said he believes some opposition stems from a misconception that test results will be used to shut poorer-performing programs.

The data from the assessments are intended to improve programs, not penalize them, he said.

Wilkins also disagrees with critics who argue that the test is not age-appropriate.

But Samuel Meisels, president of the Erikson Institute, a Chicago graduate school focusing on child development, says the test is flawed. It's too long for preschoolers' attention spans; it doesn't take into account that young children learn in uneven spurts, so a snapshot taken one day of what words they know may not be an accurate assessment of their vocabulary; many of the words are too hard for preschoolers; and the test doesn't measure the social or emotional development that Head Start provides, he said.

"I think this was an incredibly uninformed test," Meisels said.

The test might harm young children who feel they have failed when they don't know some of the answers, Meisels said. In turn, teachers and parents might conclude that children know less than they do.

Jie-Qi Chen is a professor at Erikson who teaches educators how to judge the progress of toddlers by using classroom observation techniques. Chen argues that daily or weekly classroom monitoring of students provides a better gauge of progress.

If, for example, a teacher wants to measure students' literacy development, the teacher can observe over time as the child first learns to hold a book properly, then identifies pictures and letters, and eventually retells the story by looking at the pictures and progressing through the pages.

Other critics argue that program and individual child assessments are already required for Head Start students.

"Head Start is probably one of the most evaluated programs that exists," said Joel Ryan, the director of government affairs for the National Head Start Association, an organization that advocates for Head Start programs and has worked to end the test. The association is not opposed to assessment of students in general, Ryan said, just to the standardized test.

"It's just unfair and a total waste of taxpayer money," Ryan said. "This means time away from other important things programs could be doing."

Kathryn Masterson writes for the Chicago Tribune.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.