Edwards' wife has recurrence

Despite her cancer, Democrat's run for president in '08 will continue

Politics

March 23, 2007|By Janet Hook, Peter Wallsten and David Zucchino | Janet Hook, Peter Wallsten and David Zucchino,LOS ANGELES TIMES

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. -- John Edwards stood beside his wife, Elizabeth, yesterday at the site of their wedding reception 30 years ago and said some of the most painful words a human being can utter: "Her cancer is back."

With that, the 2008 presidential campaign entered uncharted territory: A leading candidate will continue to live the public life of trying to win the White House while enduring the personal ordeal of watching his wife battle a deadly disease.

Yesterday's announcement, at an inn near the university campus where the couple met as law students, provided a glimpse of complex emotions while sparking a national debate over whether the couple should focus their energy on fighting the disease or remain in a grueling, around-the-clock campaign that can exhaust even the healthiest participants.

The Edwardses - who were upbeat during their news conference but choked up at points - surprised many when they announced that the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination was not over.

"It goes on strongly," said John Edwards, a former senator from North Carolina. "From our perspective, other than sitting around feeling sorry for ourselves, there was no reason to stop."

The couple tried to strike an optimistic tone, even while revealing that Elizabeth Edwards' cancer - first diagnosed in 2004 - had spread from the breast into her bone, indicating that it was no longer curable.

"Elizabeth will have this as long as she is alive," John Edwards said.

But the illness is treatable, he said. "And many patients in similar circumstances have lived many years undergoing treatment."

Many in the political world - and in the large community of people whose lives have been touched by cancer - responded with an outpouring of emotion.

Laura Farmer, a breast cancer survivor, said she wept while watching the televised news conference from her office in San Diego. "She's a role model for coping," said Farmer, a spokeswoman for Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a breast cancer foundation.

Andrew Sullivan, a conservative political commentator with HIV, wrote on his blog: "What I saw in this press conference was the reality of family values - not the rhetoric, not the divisiveness, not the politics, just the reality of an actual family dealing with real issues."

As a practical matter, the announcement guarantees that Edwards' campaign will receive far more attention than it has of late, as he has labored in the shadow of Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

The Edwards campaign sent out an e-mail yesterday indicating that the couple plans to attend a fundraiser this evening in Los Angeles. The candidate also was expected to stick to plans to attend two fundraisers Monday in the San Francisco area.

But the long-term political implications are uncertain. His wife's illness could engender sympathy and add an element of human interest to Edwards' campaign. But there is a risk: Some voters may regard his presidential bid as a misplaced priority, especially if her condition deteriorates.

Peter Hart, a Democratic pollster, said Edwards will have to strike a "delicate balance ... between a loving husband and an ambitious politician."

What's more, Edwards' campaign will be colored by the progress of his wife's disease. Having promised yesterday to be with her "any time, any place" that she needs him, Edwards may have to make long detours home from the campaign trail.

Rep. Lois Capps, a California Democrat whose daughter died of lung cancer seven years ago, said she was surprised to hear Edwards say he would continue to campaign. But she said it was in keeping with her decision to delve into legislative work after her daughter's death.

"You retreat or get going with renewed vigor," Capps said. "I decided to roll up my sleeves."

While Edwards is not the first politician to cope with cancer or other grave illness in a loved one, yesterday's announcement marked novel territory for presidential candidates, who already put severe strains on family life - and on their health - by deciding to run.

One Edwards strategist, Dave Saunders, said the couple's news only motivated him to work harder. "Suddenly I went from 80 miles per hour to 200 miles per hour," he said.

Saunders said Elizabeth Edwards likely was a driving force behind her husband's decision to remain in the race. "I know Elizabeth well enough to know that the last thing she would ever want is for John Edwards to step out of a race for her," he said.

The couple's news conference, televised from the grounds of an inn near the University of North Carolina, gave voters a fresh glimpse of a close political couple who already had suffered a well-publicized family tragedy. The couple's teenage son, Wade, died in a 1996 car accident.

Elizabeth, a former lawyer, is widely considered a great asset to Edwards' campaign. She recently published a book, Saving Graces, about coping with the death of her son and her bout with cancer.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.