Gonzales support appears collapsing

White House seen on aggressive search for AG replacement

March 20, 2007|By McClatchy-Tribune

WASHINGTON -- The White House began floating the names of possible replacements for Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales yesterday as the Justice Department released more internal documents related to the firings of eight U.S. attorneys last year.

One prominent Republican, who earlier had predicted that Gonzales would survive the controversy, said he expected both Gonzales and Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty to resign soon. Another well-connected Republican said that White House officials have launched an aggressive search for Gonzales' replacement, though President Bush hadn't decided whether to ask for his resignation.

Support for Gonzales appeared to be collapsing under the weight of questions about his truthfulness and his management ability. White House spokesman Tony Snow offered a tepid defense when asked if Gonzales would stay on the job until the end of Bush's term.

"We hope so," Snow said. "None of us knows what's going to happen to us over the next 21 months."

The moves toward Gonzales' ouster were first reported by politico.com, the online version of The Politico newspaper.

"The sands have been shifting pretty dramatically," one of the Republicans said. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid offending White House officials.

Possible replacements for Gonzales include Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox, White House anti-terrorism adviser Fran Townsend, former Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson and former Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson.

Gonzales' hold on his job has been in doubt since he was forced to acknowledge last week that he and his advisers have given Congress incorrect information about the dismissals of eight U.S. attorneys.

Internal administration documents collected by congressional investigators contradicted Justice Department assurances that the White House played no role in the firings. The documents also indicated that Gonzales might have known more about the plan for dismissals than he had acknowledged.

Newly released e-mails show that Justice Department officials wanted to quickly get the firings behind them after Republican losses in the midterm elections and sought a "green light" from the White House to go ahead with them.

"Not sure whether this will be determined to require the boss's attention," then-White House counsel Harriet Miers wrote in an e-mail response to Gonzales' chief of staff, Kyle Sampson.

Documents released last night show that Gonzales was unhappy with how Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty explained the firings to the Senate Judiciary Committee early last month.

"The Attorney General is extremely upset with the stories on the US Attys this morning," Justice spokesman Brian Roehrkasse, who was traveling with Gonzales in South America at the time, wrote in a Feb. 7 e-mail. "He also thought some of the DAG's statements were inaccurate."

In a statement last night, Roehrkasse said he was referring to Gonzales' concerns over the firing of Bud Cummins in Little Rock, Ark., who he believed was dismissed because of performance issues. At the hearing, McNulty indicated Cummins was being replaced by a political ally.

The new e-mails spell out some of the reasons behind the ousters and the heavy-handed manner in which they were carried out.

At one point, McNulty questioned the dismissal of U.S. Attorney Daniel Bogden in Nevada. "I'm a little skittish about Bogden," McNulty wrote in a Dec. 7 e-mail to Gonzales' chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, two days before the firings. "He has been with DOJ since 1990 and, at age 50, has never had a job outside government."

Still, McNulty concluded: "I'll admit have not looked at his district's performance. Sorry to be raising this again/now; it was just on my mind last night and this morning."

One document shows that U.S. Attorney Margaret Chiara in Grand Rapids, Mich., the last of eight prosecutors to announce their resignations, learned from McNulty's top aide four days before the Nov. 7 election that the White House would be asking her to leave after the election.

"I ask that you tell me why my resignation may be requested," Chiara wrote McNulty in an Election Day e-mail. "I need to know the truth to live in peace with the aftermath."

Some 3,000 pages of e-mails and other documents were delivered late Wednesday night to the House and Senate judiciary committees. The House panel posted many of them on its Web site, in addition to those released publicly by the Justice Department.

Congressional Democrats said they're increasingly convinced that at least some of the ousted prosecutors were fired because they either investigated Republicans or declined to prosecute Democrats. Administration officials have repeatedly denied that politics played any role in the firings.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.