Supporters of war make their voices heard in Md.

Four years on, some say U.S. must finish crucial military mission it started in Iraq

March 19, 2007|By David Nitkin | David Nitkin,Sun reporter

Four years into the war, about 90 million Americans remain committed to the combat mission in Iraq, a significant proportion of the population whose views are being overshadowed by the growing push to bring the troops home.

While they no longer constitute a majority, supporters of the war are convinced that the United States has an important task to complete even if the end is nowhere in sight.

In dozens of interviews across Maryland in recent days, those who favor the war said the risks of leaving Iraq outweigh those of pressing ahead.

"I don't think it helps America's image in that region of the world if we keep jumping in and jumping out," said Chris Plassman, 42, of Finksburg, who works for a defense contractor and is keenly aware that his is now the minority view. U.S. forces should not leave Iraq "without a better conclusion in place."

But he conceded, "To arrive at that conclusion is a cost that the majority of American people don't feel willing to pay."

When President Bush announced the start of the Iraq invasion four years ago tonight, more than 70 percent of American adults thought the course was correct. But as sectarian violence divides Iraq and progress stagnates, that has shrunk to about 40 percent, according to surveys this month by The New York Times and by the Pew Research Center in February.

As their ranks dwindle, war supporters are receiving less attention from the news media as well as from many political leaders trying to tap anti-Bush administration sentiments as the 2008 election draws nearer.

"Look, I think the American people are done with Iraq," Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, a New York Democrat running for president, said last week.

Yet even in Maryland, among the nation's more liberal states, supporters of military action are not hard to find. Their numbers are greatest, interviews and opinion polls indicate, in small towns and rural areas away from Baltimore and Washington.

But in urban neighborhoods and suburbs, backers of the war continue to make their voices heard. Many have children or relatives in the military, or are retired from the armed services. Others are employed by companies with close ties to the military establishment, a sizable group in Maryland because of the proximity to Washington.

"Public opinion about the war is very much organized around people's political self-identity and their support of President Bush," said Scott Keeter, director of survey research for the Pew Research Center, which has been tracking war attitudes for four years. "Bush and the war are basically intertwined in the mind of the public."

The White House issued a fourth anniversary "fact sheet" that called for "patience and determination" while insisting that Iraqis "are beginning to meet benchmarks to achieve political reconciliation."

Supporters of the war acknowledge that its planning has gone badly, Sun interviews show. Many are troubled by images of wounded soldiers - some of them middle-aged reservists and National Guard troops torn from their families and careers - returning to lives different from the ones they left behind.

Supporters say that slanted reports in the news media and a steady drumbeat of ill-informed criticism are swaying public opinion on the war, though their arguments seem devoid of bitterness or self-righteousness.

"I shudder to think what would have happened if we had had the media coverage of today during World War II," said Donald Hoffman, 61, a retired Baltimore teacher who lives in Carroll County. "How would people have reacted to the horror of the storming of Normandy?"

For Ronald R. Colunga, 54, director of business development for an international aerospace company, the war effort has deep meaning.

"I believe this country could not sustain its moral fiber if we pulled out," said Colunga, a former Air Force colonel who lives in Hagerstown. "I don't believe we have the wrong approach, because the Iraqi people want to be free to govern themselves. And I believe, within their borders, they can."

Colunga was one of several who expressed dismay at the relatively low U.S. troop level in Iraq. They said the pre-invasion recommendation of Gen. Eric K. Shinseki, then the Army's chief of staff, that "several hundred thousand soldiers" would be needed to pacify Iraq after the early rounds of combat should have been followed.

"There are some days I wake up and say, `We're doing the right thing,'" said Kathy Howell, 43, a veterinary technician who recently became a stay-at-home mom. But she said that when she sees television reports of soldiers with brain injuries or missing limbs, "it breaks my heart."

Howell would like to see military operations coupled with an approach that recognizes cultural differences.

"We're fighting countries that have been fighting since the beginning of time," the Hagerstown resident said. "The U.S. wants to go in and impress an American style of life, and I don't know if that's the right approach."

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.