Advertisement

Study questions use of routine CT lung scans

March 09, 2007|By Thomas H. Maugh II , LOS ANGELES TIMES

Only five months after a major study recommended routine use of CT scans to detect lung cancer, a second study recommends the opposite, concluding that the scans do not save lives.

Both studies found an estimated 10-year survival rate as high as 90 percent among patients whose cancers were detected early. But the new study, reported Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found no difference in the number of lung cancer deaths between the screened group and a control group.

"CT scanning is an experimental procedure and there is no evidence that it is reducing the death rate," said epidemiologist Colin B. Begg of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, senior author of the paper. "It really should not be used outside of clinical trials."

Advertisement

The primary drawback to CT scanning is that it can detect very small tumors that may not present a risk of turning into advanced lung cancer. Nonetheless, patients may undergo surgery, which carries its own risks.

Dr. Claudia I. Henschke of the Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York, who led the first study, argued that the results from the two studies were very similar.

She maintained that Begg and his co-authors were simply interpreting the results "in the most negative way possible."

The conflict of opinion is reminiscent of the early days of mammography, when competing studies showed both benefit and lack of benefit, said Dr. Richard Wasley, director of imaging at Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center in Fountain Valley, Calif., who was not involved in either study.

"It took 30 years to show that mammography was useful," he said.

More than 200,000 Americans develop lung cancer every year and about 163,000 are expected to die from it this year, according to the American Cancer Society.

The goal of CT scanning is to find lung cancers while they are still at an early, curable stage.

Chest X-rays have previously been shown to be useless for lung cancer screening because they do not detect small tumors. CT scans, which produce a sophisticated three-dimensional image of the chest using X-rays, can see much smaller objects.

"For ovarian, colon, breast and prostate cancer, the key to effective treatment is early diagnosis and surgical resection," said Dr. James McPherson, a lung cancer specialist and cardiothoracic surgeon at Centinela Freeman Regional Medical Center in Inglewood, Calif. "Why should lung cancer be different from any other cancer?"

Baltimore Sun Articles
|