Letters To The Editor


February 09, 2007

House new residents near Charles Street

The Dixon Transition Team Report, issued last week, calls for "improving the Charles Street-North Avenue corridor and refurbishing central Baltimore ... the section north of Mount Vernon and south of 33rd Street," according to The Sun ("So much to do, so little time," editorial, Feb. 4).

At the same time, an alert new city administration wants to attract new residents who will be coming to the metropolitan area as a result of the Base Realignment and Closure plan, which will bring many thousands of workers from Virginia and New Jersey to jobs at Fort Meade and Aberdeen Proving Ground ("City invites BRAC growth," Feb. 5).

These two concepts suggest that new and renovated housing between Mount Vernon and Charles Village - with nearby rail connections from Penn Station to Fort Meade and Aberdeen - could create a "win-win" picture for newcomers, for city enthusiasts and for efforts to reduce gas consumption and pollution.

Residents in mid-city neighborhoods are already commuting through Penn Station to employment centers in Washington in increasing numbers.

The area near Charles Street and North Avenue offers a huge opportunity to expand this practice.

Alan Shecter


The writer's family company owns the Charles and Everyman theaters and other commercial properties in the Station North area.

Study isn't needed to end ground rent

I was encouraged to read in The Sun that Gov. Martin O'Malley is lending his support to plans to revamp the arcane system of ground rents ("Ground rent called unjust," Feb. 6).

But the words in the article that really caught my attention related to creating a "task force" to study the legislation.

Don't do it. Creating a task force is no more than code by the opposition for "let's study it to death." And perhaps along the way the legislation will be blocked or be so watered down as to be ineffective.

Just get on with passing the legislation.

It is long overdue.

Franklin Shekore


Council is culpable in rowhouse razing

Now that Mercy Medical Center has apparently prevailed in its bid to demolish another artifact of Baltimore's history, the role of the City Council in allowing this to go forward should be fully acknowledged ("Challenge to razing dropped," Feb. 6).

As the city rushes toward a mayoral election, with some members of the council pursuing the job, elected officials should be wary of supporting legislation that betrays their allegiance to large, moneyed interests of the city's power elite.

Especially deserving of scrutiny, in the aftermath of the decision by Baltimore Heritage to drop its challenge to the demolition, is the behavior of City Councilman Keiffer J. Mitchell Jr., a notable mayoral hopeful.

The councilman is responsible for the amendment that removed protections for the historic properties Mercy will now reduce to dust and rubble ("Houses stripped of protection," Nov. 26).

It appears that Mr. Mitchell's allegiance to Baltimore's past is history; how can he presume to lead in the future?

A. I. Schneiderman


Targeting Mitchell sends chilling signal

Not only does Harbor Bank's asking Councilman Keiffer J. Mitchell Jr. to take an unpaid leave send "a chilling message to professionals - especially young professionals - that running for public office might well compromise their ability to support themselves and their families" ("Unceremonious boot," editorial, Jan. 31), it also sends the chilling message that if you are an honorable public servant, the powers that be in City Hall may create some fictional brouhaha to derail you.

Mr. Mitchell has done nothing but serve his constituents in the most honorable and effective manner.

Baltimore would be fortunate to have at its helm a man of such integrity.

Mike Harris


Let public decide on death penalty

The best way to settle the death penalty issue is to put the question on the ballot and let the people decide ("Is death penalty a deterrent or an atrocity?" letters, Feb. 3).

Richard L. Lelonek


One optical scanner isn't nearly enough

State Elections Administrator Linda H. Lamone's proposal to "add one optical scanner to every precinct in 2008," while retaining the state's paperless touch-screen machines, is only the latest evidence that she is not qualified to supervise the state's election system ("Voting reform seen unlikely until 2010," Feb. 2).

The argument made by those who want to delay replacing the touch-screen system boils down to this: Election security isn't worth the money. But what, pray tell, is more important than the integrity of the ballot - the heart of any democratic system of government?

Florida, the state that sparked all this concern over voting technology seven years ago, has announced that it's giving up on the touch-screen machines and moving to optical scanners.

How can Maryland do any less?

Michael Berla


Stereotypes still limit black actors

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.