Towns across U.S. join fight against global warming

Communities cutting energy use, emissions

December 10, 2006|By Stephanie Simon | Stephanie Simon,LOS ANGELES TIMES

BOULDER, Colo. -- Frustrated with the federal response to global warming, hundreds of cities, suburbs and rural communities across the nation have taken bold steps to slash their energy consumption and reduce emissions of the pollutants that cause climate change.

This outdoorsy college town recently adopted the nation's first "climate tax" - an extra fee for electricity use, with all proceeds going to fight global warming. Seattle has imposed a new parking tax, and the mayor said he hopes to charge tolls on major roads in an effort to discourage driving - a major source of greenhouse gas pollution.

Cities not typically associated with liberal causes have also jumped on board. In Fargo, N.D., Mayor Dennis Walaker swapped out every traffic-light bulb for a light-emitting diode, or LED, which uses 80 percent less energy. In Carmel, Ind., a suburb of Indianapolis, Mayor James Brainard is switching the city fleet to hybrids and vehicles that run on bio-fuels (made from plant products rather than petroleum).

"It's quite incredible, the number of things cities are beginning to do. It's very heartening," said Tom Kelly, who directs a national environmental group called Kyoto USA.

Boulder Mayor Mark Ruzzin says skeptics often ask why global warming must be a local priority. He responds by acknowledging the obvious: "Even if Boulder could somehow wish away all of our greenhouse gas emissions, that wouldn't be a drop in the bucket. It would be a drop within a drop in the bucket."

Then he argues that the city must try anyway - if only to prove to larger communities that they, too, can reduce pollutants without spending huge sums or slowing economic growth. "Every one of us has the ability, small as it may be, to make change," Ruzzin tells his residents, asking them to substitute a push mower for a gas mower, or at least to turn out all the lights when they leave a room. "No one's going to be able to escape the responsibility."

The movement began nearly two years ago, when Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels announced that his city would strive to meet the targets of the Kyoto Protocols, an international treaty that aims to control global warming. The Kyoto treaty requires industrialized nations to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants that hover in the lower atmosphere. In what is known as a greenhouse effect, these pollutants create an invisible shield that keeps the sun's rays from dissipating. Many of the trapped rays are reflected back to Earth, raising global temperatures.

Greenhouse gases are directly tied to energy use, because the process of burning coal to produce electricity emits carbon dioxide. So any measures to conserve energy can indirectly cut greenhouse emissions.

Planting trees can also help, because they absorb carbon dioxide - and several cities have launched campaigns to take advantage of that fact. Denver, for instance, plans to plant an average of 140 trees a day for the next 20 years, while Los Angeles is replacing its famed fan palms with leafier sycamores and oaks. Chicago encourages the planting of lush rooftop gardens, which have the added effect of cooling buildings, reducing the need for air conditioning.

Fargo acts on climate change more directly by trapping the methane that normally wafts out of its landfill as a byproduct of rotting garbage. The methane - a potent greenhouse gas - is then sold to a soybean processing plant, which uses it in its boilers.

"All these cities are like little laboratories, experimenting with what works. Then we learn from each other," Brainard said.

President Bush pulled the U.S. out of the Kyoto Treaty soon after he took office, calling it ineffective and unfair because developing countries such as China and India are exempt. He also argued that it would be enormously expensive for the U.S. to comply.

Determined to prove him wrong, Nickels challenged his fellow mayors to adopt Kyoto's targets at the local level. He has received more than 330 pledges, from mayors representing 54 million people. All have vowed to reduce their cities' emissions below 1990 levels within the next several years.

Some of the biggest urban areas have made the pledge: Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Miami, Dallas and Denver. So have Turtle River, Minn. (population 79), and North Pole, Alaska (population 1,778).

Meridian, Miss., where nearly 30 percent of residents live in poverty, has signed on to the Kyoto goals. So have Sugar Land, Texas, Dubuque, Iowa, and Norman, Okla. Scores of blue-state coastal cities are on the list, including Berkeley, Calif., and Cambridge, Mass. The industrial Rust Belt town of Gary, Ind., is also taking part.

The 70 cities that reported statistics last year reduced carbon dioxide emissions by an aggregate total of 23 million tons. That's not a huge sum considering that the U.S. as a nation would have to eliminate more than 1.6 billion tons to meet the Kyoto targets.

But those working on the issue expect the numbers to pick up drastically in the coming years. More than 100 mayors have found the reforms so painless that they have set far more ambitious targets than those laid out in Kyoto, according to Michelle Wyman, the executive director of ICLEI, a nonprofit working with local governments on climate change.

Stephanie Simon writes for the Los Angeles Times.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.