As if Maryland's Election Day wasn't bogged down in enough uncertainty, now comes the specter of poll watchers whose purpose may be to discourage people from voting. Or perhaps they'll be there - as sponsoring state GOP officials claim - to prevent fraud. We'd like to think that the latter is their sole motivation. But the watchers' instruction manual strikes a somewhat confrontational tone, particularly for a job that's traditionally been about observing rather than policing participants. Certainly, there was no indication of fraud in September's primary (and precious little two years ago or four years ago) to justify such an aggressive approach.
Not only might voters be intimidated, but election judges could find themselves bullied, too. The GOP poll watchers' 13-page manual instructs watchers to remind judges with whom they disagree that they may be criminally prosecuted. If judges are the weak link in the voting process (and the primary demonstrated that they are), this can only make matters worse. To be fair, Democrats have their own poll watchers, but their focus, according to their "voter protection" manual, is to "ensure that every eligible voter who wants to vote gets to vote."
