Q&a -- Ed Rutkowski

Q&A

Proving that cities aren't hopeless

October 29, 2006|By Jamie Smith Hopkins | Jamie Smith Hopkins,sun staff

If you've thought lately about moving to Baltimore's Patterson Park neighborhood, thank Ed Rutkowski.

The community activist leveraged everything he could get, from local volunteers to government funding, to help reverse its decline into crime, abandonment and decay. Ten years after he founded the nonprofit Patterson Park Community Development Corp., the Southeast Baltimore neighborhood is generally hailed as a turnaround success story - so much so that his group is looking for new challenges in other places.

The CDC has focused much of its attention on buying and redeveloping rowhouses, but Rutkowski wasn't a developer by trade. A software development manager, first for IBM and then for UPS, he brought an engineer's eye to the challenge of neighborhood revitalization: See things the way they are, not as you wish they would be. And fix them.

"I really believe in cities," said Rutkowski, 59, who grew up in Baltimore and now lives in a Canton condo with his wife of 30 years, Kay Rutkowski, a retired nurse. "I think cities are the height of civilization, not the suburbs, and that just makes them more important." With the housing market slowing across the region and the nation, sharply in some places, do you think Baltimore's revitalization will slow or stop?

There are things that are going to continue to drive people into Baltimore City. The lack of places to build in the suburbs, the expense of the county, the traffic. Those things are going to drive people to continue to live in the city, so I do think that even though the market's slow now, that inevitably it picks up again. Which areas of the city do you believe hold the most promise for revitalization?

The places that are the most affordable are going to appeal to the people with the least money. ... The places near MARC stations are going to appeal to people who work in Washington. Places near institutions - Hopkins, University of Maryland - clearly they're going to appeal to people who work at Hopkins, University of Maryland. Places with particular kinds of housing stock are going to appeal to people who want that kind of housing stock. ... So there are things that are going to drive each market, each subset of the market. Then the question is, how big is the demand going to be for any of those things? ... Each neighborhood has a set of strengths to build on, and it's a question of finding those things - for each neighborhood to work at attracting the kind of people that they're going to appeal to. Are you concerned that Baltimore's crime troubles will undermine renewal efforts?

The question is, do I worry about it? I don't worry about it. Why? Don't think you get off that easily.

Because I think ... as long as we keep taking back our neighborhoods a block at a time, our city a neighborhood at a time, the places where we do that, where people keep moving in, by virtue of the fact that we've got new people willing to fight, that crime will continue to lessen. I think really, part of the historical problem has been that there wasn't enough demand to hardly change anywhere, and as a consequence, crime was more clearly a problem. Regardless of who is at fault, do you think that the poor performance of the city's public schools works against families putting down roots in the city?

I think it does. I think it's inescapable. The next question is, how much, and are things getting better? I don't pay enough attention to know how the schools are doing citywide; I do know that we've opened what I think is a tremendously successful charter school here, Patterson Park Public Charter School. ... I know that people have stayed in this neighborhood with children because of the charter school. What steps could the city's political and business leaders take - besides spending money - to help revitalization?

The thing that I've said often enough is, `You know, it does take money.' ... And [what] we've promoted - unsuccessfully, it's quite difficult - is to earmark some of the increase in tax revenue that we get from existing revitalization efforts for future revitalization efforts, and that way you extend success. ... I think the city needs to invest in its neighborhoods; the state and the federal government, especially, need to invest in cities. I don't think there's as much investment as there should be. I think we've too long viewed the urban situation as hopeless, and I hope that one of the things we've proven is it's not. But it's taken a tremendous investment of time and money. It doesn't just happen. What can grass-roots organizations do to become more effective at revitalization?

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.