Soccer: An away game

More Americans than ever play the world's most popular sport. But the lack of passion for the World Cup in the United States shows that it is not part of our national story.

June 11, 2006|By MICHAEL HILL | MICHAEL HILL,SUN REPORTER

The United States just became very isolated from the rest of the world. It's not because of the war in Iraq or differences over the policy toward Iran. It's because of soccer.

In almost every other country on the globe, the next month will be a semi-vacation. Rather than going about their quotidian tasks, people will be huddled around TVs and radios, paying close attention to every game of soccer's quadrennial World Cup - and then spending endless hours afterward analyzing the various nuances of the contests.

In the U.S., there will be the pockets of passion for the tournament that started Friday (the U.S. plays its first match tomorrow, against the Czech Republic). There is no doubt there will be more attention paid than ever before.

But, on the whole, the country will go about its business as usual.

The passion for soccer reaches right up to our borders, but it fails to take root when it tries to grow in the 50 United States. The sports acreage in America - among the most fertile in the world - has been filled with other flourishing pastimes, making it difficult for soccer to find a place to grow.

"Basically, there are three sports in the hegemonic sports culture of the United States," says Andrei Markovits, referring to baseball, football and basketball. "Three-and-a-half if you count ice hockey.

"These are the ones that create the traditions and the history and the smells and involvement and passion in a way that goes way beyond the activities of the producers of the sports themselves," says Markovits, a professor of politics at the University of Michigan who literally wrote the book on why the U.S. has never taken to soccer - Offside: Soccer and American Exceptionalism.

"Soccer has always been played in America, but it has never become part of that hegemonic sports culture," he says. "It's like the shot put."

According to Michael Mandelbaum, a professor at the Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies who wrote The Meaning of Sports, "Baseball, football, basketball and ice hockey got here first and established themselves. There is not all that much space left."

Certainly, soccer occupies a bigger space than it used to. As Markovits says, it has become like the Olympics. Americans treat soccer as they do track and field or gymnastics or speed skating during the Summer and Winter Games - raising their awareness during the World Cup, but essentially forgetting about it in the years in between.

Many thought it would be different by now. After all, it has been a generation since the most popular sport in the world became a mainstay of suburban America. Millions of kids grow up kicking a ball and learning the offside rule. The term "soccer mom" is a certified cliche.

That growth has in many ways done exactly what it was supposed to. You don't have to strain your eyes on the tiny agate type of the sports pages to find out results, as you did a couple of decades ago.

All the games are televised. Watching the World Cup once meant going to smoky locales for a closed-circuit telecast.

There is an established professional league in this country - the latest of many attempts at that. And the U.S. national team, a surprise when it made it through the qualifying rounds and got to the World Cup in 1990, is now expected to qualify.

And that team is made up of genuine native Americans who grew up playing the game, not the motley assortment that dominated the roster a few World Cups ago - players who qualified for U.S. soccer citizenship but were raised in Europe.

What soccer has not become is part of the national discussion in the way the big three sports are.

"The game is almost incidental to the importance of a sport," Markovits says. "What is much more important is the talk about the game, the worry, the waiting."

In short, soccer has not become part of the American myth. It does not resonate beyond the playing field the way the dominant sports do. You just don't hear people debating the choice between Bobby Convey and DeMarcus Beasley like they do that between Steve McNair and Kyle Boller.

"If you play the game just for the sake of the game, and it is not anchored in other aspects of the culture, it can't sustain you in the same way," says David Andrews, a sociologist of sports at the University of Maryland, College Park.

As sports historians such as Allen Guttman of Amherst College tell the story, what we now know as organized sport was essentially invented between 1860 and 1930. Rules were standardized, leagues formed, jerseys designed, stadiums constructed, the entire apparatus of the modern sports structure created.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.