Outrage over infill in suburban areas

Building on lots long left in greenery irks residents

Infill satisfies Smart Growth standards

June 10, 2006|By TIMOTHY B. WHEELER | TIMOTHY B. WHEELER,SUN REPORTER

Andrea Soukup has only to look out her window to see the scar in the pastoral landscape of the Cromwell Valley, a lush green fabric of rolling fields and forested, rocky hills just north of Baltimore's Beltway.

Across the Gunpowder Falls from her home, a portion of the ridge has been stripped of trees, the denuded slope girdled by a massive retaining wall. Construction crews toil atop the narrow crest, carving - blasting, in some cases, out of solid rock - a two-lane road and enough flat land on which to build 17 houses.

"They've pretty much devastated it up there," said Soukup. An artist, she has lived in the area with her husband for three years.

All around the Beltway, Baltimore suburbanites are watching in dismay as their treasured patches of green - a vacant lot or copse of trees - go under the bulldozer. Driven by the real estate boom, developers are scouring established neighborhoods for pocket-sized parcels of land skipped over in years past, often because the spots were too costly or difficult to build on. They are proposing - or, in some cases, reviving long-dormant plans - to build anywhere from a few to a few dozen houses.

Such "infill" development is supposed to happen under Smart Growth, Maryland's pioneering sprawl-fighting policy. To slow the loss of forest, farmland and scenic rural vistas, state and local officials have pledged to try to steer new construction toward built-up communities where roads, schools, sewer lines and other infrastructure already exist.

But projects such as the one in Cromwell Woods in Baltimore County are rousing neighbors' ire. They contend that some land escaped development in the past because it was on slopes too steep to build, or too near streams. To let construction go forward now, they contend, threatens to degrade already stressed suburban streams and undermine residents' quality of life.

"It's just amazing to me what gets approved," said Soukup.

To others as well.

"That development ... is an atrocious example of infill," said T. Brian McIntire, who represents the area on the Baltimore County Council. "How our department of environment approved it I'll never know."

Key exemption

"It met all the requirements," countered David A. C. Carroll, director of the county's Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management. Carroll acknowledged, though, that the project did secure one key exemption - from the state's forest conservation law, which would have limited tree removal or required reforestation of the ridge. The state law does not apply to projects approved before its 1991 passage, he said.

The Cromwell Woods development plan was originally approved by the county in the 1980s, said Arnold F. "Pat" Keller, the county's planning director. The property is just inside the county's growth boundary, where water and sewer service are available and zoning allows housing to be built.

Keller said that when the ridge-top parcel didn't get developed years ago, he and others assumed that it never would because of its rugged topography.

"In many respects it fell off the radar screen," Keller said. "Should it have been or could it have been developed? I think the answer is pretty evident, if you've driven out there. It probably shouldn't have. But it had the zoning."

Nor is Cromwell Valley the only place where development approved long ago is now cropping up.

Residents of a Lutherville neighborhood, for example, are fighting a developer's bid to build eight houses on a patch of woods left in a community originally approved by the county in the 1920s.

Smaller projects

Keller said planning records indicate 8,000 to 9,000 housing units remain unbuilt in Baltimore County that have been approved in years past.

Other suburbs of Baltimore say they also are seeing more infill projects, some of them remnants of land left over from prior development or extra building lots carved out where zoning allows.

"There's a lot of one-unit, two-unit plans coming in, and a lot of five-unit plans," said Jeff Bronow, research chief for Howard County's department of planning and zoning. He said he has tracked a two-thirds decline in the average size of housing projects there over the past 12 years.

"The less easy land to develop is starting to be developed now," Bronow said.

In the Cromwell Woods case, road access and the high cost of preparing the ridge top for housing kept it from being developed until now, said David Altfeld, co-owner of the development firm, Southern Land Co.

"At one point it wouldn't have been feasible economically, but now with the recent surge in real estate values, it's made more sense," Altfeld said.

Still, he said, "it's a special piece [of land]. Its location and the views from the top of the ridge make it a very unique property with unique lots."

He said his firm is negotiating with national home-building companies to put up "executive-size houses" on the 12 lots the firm owns. An additional five houses are to be built by others on redrawn lots in the old subdivision.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.